metolachlor · Yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
24 claims from these papers; 14 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor1 (1988)
decreaseIn 1987 metolachlor at 9.0 kg/ha reduced peanut yield.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseMetolachlor-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Interaction of Flumioxazin with Dimethenamid or Metolachlor in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 (2004)
decreaseAt Pearsall, metolachlor reduced peanut yield within the reported 24 to 48% range.
Weeds Control Effect of Metolachlor EC in Peanut Fields (2011)increasePeanut output increased 12.6%～27.5% with metolachlor.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Interaction of Flumioxazin with Dimethenamid or Metolachlor in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 (2004)
decreaseAt Pearsall, metolachlor reduced peanut yield within the reported 24 to 48% range.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseMetolachlor-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
14 citations between these papers: 6 on the same side, 8 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 13
Weed control in rainfed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Guinea savanna zone of Nigeria · 1981
- positive
Weed Control, Yield, and Net Returns Using Imazethapyr in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaeaL.) · 1991
- positive
Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Imazethapyr and Metolachlor · 1995
- positive
- positive
Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Flumioxazin Preemergence · 1999
- positive
Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Flumioxazin Preemergencel · 1999
- positive
- positive
Integrated weed management in irrigated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) · 2001
- positive
- positive
- positive
Weed Management with Diclosulam in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 · 2002
- positive
- positive
Weeds Control Effect of Metolachlor EC in Peanut Fields · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor1 · 1988
- negative
- no effect
Metolachlor Effects on Peanut Growth and Development · 1988
- negative
- no effect
Interaction of Flumioxazin with Dimethenamid or Metolachlor in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 2004
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.