Abstract
Randomized block design was employed to study the safety and control effect of different spraying dosages of 720 g/L metolachlor EC in peanut fields.The result showed that: both the weed number and fresh weight control effect on broadleaf weeds and graminanous weeds in peanut field of 720 g/L metolachlor EC were greater than 95%(15～35 days after application) with 1.50～2.25 kg/hm2 application dosage,the output of peanut increased 12.6%～27.5%,and it was safe to peanut,which suggested that the herbicide was an optimum agent to control weeds in peanut field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor controlled broadleaf weed numbers and fresh weight by more than 95% at 15–35 days.
- Taxon
- broadleaf weedse0
- Treatment
- 720 g/L metolachlor ECe0
- Interactor
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0other - Outcome
- weed number and fresh weight control effecte0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Value
- 95%e0
- Qualifier
- 15～35 days after applicatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both the weed number and fresh weight control effect on broadleaf weeds and graminanous weeds in peanut field of 720 g/L metolachlor EC were greater than 95%(15～35 days after application) with 1.50～2.25 kg/hm2 application dosage”
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor controlled graminanous weed numbers and fresh weight by more than 95%.
- Taxon
- graminanous weedse0
- Treatment
- 720 g/L metolachlor ECe0
- Interactor
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0other
- Outcome
- weed number and fresh weight control effecte0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Value
- 95%e0
- Qualifier
- 1.50～2.25 kg/hm2 application dosagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both the weed number and fresh weight control effect on broadleaf weeds and graminanous weeds in peanut field of 720 g/L metolachlor EC were greater than 95%(15～35 days after application) with 1.50～2.25 kg/hm2 application dosage”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut output increased 12.6%～27.5% with metolachlor.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- 720 g/L metolachlor ECe1
- Outcome
- output of peanute0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 12.6%～27.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the output of peanut increased 12.6%～27.5%”
e1“different spraying dosages of 720 g/L metolachlor EC”
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor was safe to peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- 720 g/L metolachlor ECe1
- Outcome
- safe to peanute0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was safe to peanut”
e1“different spraying dosages of 720 g/L metolachlor EC”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicide was recommended as an optimum peanut weed control agent.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- 720 g/L metolachlor ECe1
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- control weeds in peanut fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the herbicide was an optimum agent to control weeds in peanut field”
e1“different spraying dosages of 720 g/L metolachlor EC”
The same questions in other papers
metolachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →metolachlor · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.