Paper · 1981 · Weed Research

Weed control in rainfed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Guinea savanna zone of Nigeria

S. T. O. LAGOKE; A. H. CHOUDHARY; Y. M. TANKO

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary: Field trials were conducted to evaluate herbicides for weed control in groundnut from 1977 to 1979. The pre‐emergence herbicides used were alachlor and metolachlor, applied alone or mixed with terbutryne. Some treatments were followed either by post‐emergence bentazone or by one supplementary hoe‐weeding. In the southern Guinea savanna zone, where early grass weed control was more important, alachlor or metolachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1 gave adequate weed control and pod yields comparable with that of the hoe‐weeded check. There was no advantage in adding terbutryne, or in supplementary hoeweeding or post‐emergence bentazone application. In the northern Guinea savanna zone, grass and broad‐leaved weeds were equally important. Application of alachlor, metolachlor or mixtures with terbutryne (2:1) at 1.5 kg ha −1 required post‐emergence application of bentazone or supplementary hoe‐weeding for effective weed control and high pod yield. The reduction in pod yield on untreated control plots ranged between 18 and 70% of the best treatment in these trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1 adequately controlled southern-zone weeds.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
alachlor or metolachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1e0
Interactor
grass weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
adequatee0
Comparator
hoe‐weeded checke0
Setting
southern Guinea savanna zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the southern Guinea savanna zone, where early grass weed control was more important, alachlor or metolachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1 gave adequate weed control and pod yields comparable with that of the hoe‐weeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor or metolachlor yielded pods comparably to hoe weeding in the southern zone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
alachlor or metolachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
pod yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
hoe‐weeded checke0
Setting
southern Guinea savanna zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the southern Guinea savanna zone, where early grass weed control was more important, alachlor or metolachlor at 1.5 kg ha −1 gave adequate weed control and pod yields comparable with that of the hoe‐weeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding terbutryne provided no advantage in the southern zone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
adding terbutrynee0
Outcome
advantagee0
Direction
no advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no advantage in adding terbutryne, or in supplementary hoeweeding or post‐emergence bentazone application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary hoeweeding provided no advantage in the southern zone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
supplementary hoeweedinge0
Outcome
advantagee0
Direction
no advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no advantage in adding terbutryne, or in supplementary hoeweeding or post‐emergence bentazone application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence bentazone provided no advantage in the southern zone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
post‐emergence bentazone applicatione0
Outcome
advantagee0
Direction
no advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no advantage in adding terbutryne, or in supplementary hoeweeding or post‐emergence bentazone application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In the northern zone, herbicides required bentazone or hoe weeding for effective weed control and high pod yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
required post‐emergence application of bentazone or supplementary hoe‐weeding for effective weed control and high pod yielde0
Setting
northern Guinea savanna zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the northern Guinea savanna zone, grass and broad‐leaved weeds were equally important. Application of alachlor, metolachlor or mixtures with terbutryne (2:1) at 1.5 kg ha −1 required post‐emergence application of bentazone or supplementary hoe‐weeding for effective weed control and high pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had 18 to 70% lower pod yield than the best treatment.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
untreated control plotse0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
18 and 70%e0
Comparator
best treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in pod yield on untreated control plots ranged between 18 and 70% of the best treatment in these trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–55 · show in text ↑

alachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

alachlor · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

metolachlor · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.