Abstract
Operational Research Project on dryland agriculture with its main focus on participatory technology demonstration functioned at Alanatha cluster of villages from 2010 to 2014. Based on the PRA and benchmark survey, technical interventions have been taken up under different themes. Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively). Introduction of pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping system resulted in higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1173 kg/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.43) and net returns ( 32415/ha) compared to sole crop of pigeonpea (1093 kg/ha), field bean (461 kg/ha). Improved medium duration finger millet variety GPU-66 produced higher grain yield (2722 kg/ha) and net returns ( 25542/ha) followed by variety ML-365. Improved pigeonpea variety TTB 7 produced higher seed yield (879 kg/ha). Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrients gave maximum net returns ( 36504/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.72) and higher yield (2899 kg/ha) compared to farmers’ practice. Pre-emergent application of alachlor @ 2.5 lt/ha along with one hand weeding recorded lower weed menace and higher groundnut pod yield (499 kg/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows in finger millet plus pigeonpea intercropping raised finger millet grain equivalent yield to 3156 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae1 - Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- finger millet grain equivalent yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 3156 kg/hae1
- Setting
- Alanatha cluster of villagese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Operational Research Project on dryland agriculture with its main focus on participatory technology demonstration functioned at Alanatha cluster of villages from 2010 to 2014”
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows in groundnut plus pigeonpea intercropping raised groundnut equivalent yield to 1007 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- groundnut equivalente1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1007 kg/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows gave higher finger millet net returns of 37390.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 37390e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows gave higher groundnut net returns of 18842/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 18842/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows gave higher finger millet sustainable yield index of 0.56.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- sustainable yield indexe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 0.56e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture conservation furrows gave higher groundnut sustainable yield index of 0.30.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- Opening of moisture conservation furrowe1
- Outcome
- sustainable yield indexe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 0.30e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Opening of moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea in finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) intercropping systems recorded higher finger millet grain equivalent yield (3156 kg/ha) and groundnut equivalent (1007 kg/ha) yield with higher net returns( 37390 and 18842/ha, respectively) and higher values of sustainable yield index (0.56 and 0.30, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus field bean intercropping gave higher pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1173 kg/ha than sole pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane2 - Treatment
- pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping systeme2
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 1173 kg/hae2
- Comparator
- sole crop of pigeonpeae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Introduction of pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping system resulted in higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1173 kg/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.43) and net returns ( 32415/ha) compared to sole crop of pigeonpea (1093 kg/ha), field bean (461 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus field bean intercropping gave higher sustainable yield index value of 0.43.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping systeme2
- Outcome
- sustainable yield index valuee2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 0.43e2
- Comparator
- sole crop of pigeonpeae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Introduction of pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping system resulted in higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1173 kg/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.43) and net returns ( 32415/ha) compared to sole crop of pigeonpea (1093 kg/ha), field bean (461 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus field bean intercropping gave higher net returns of 32415/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping systeme2
- Outcome
- net returnse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 32415/hae2
- Comparator
- sole crop of pigeonpeae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Introduction of pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping system resulted in higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1173 kg/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.43) and net returns ( 32415/ha) compared to sole crop of pigeonpea (1093 kg/ha), field bean (461 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved finger millet variety GPU-66 gave higher grain yield of 2722 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae3
- Material
- GPU-66e3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2722 kg/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Improved medium duration finger millet variety GPU-66 produced higher grain yield (2722 kg/ha) and net returns ( 25542/ha) followed by variety ML-365”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved finger millet variety GPU-66 gave higher net returns of 25542/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae3
- Material
- GPU-66e3
- Outcome
- net returnse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 25542/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Improved medium duration finger millet variety GPU-66 produced higher grain yield (2722 kg/ha) and net returns ( 25542/ha) followed by variety ML-365”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved pigeonpea variety TTB 7 gave higher seed yield of 879 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Improved pigeonpea variety TTB 7 produced higher seed yield (879 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic and inorganic fertilisers with micronutrients gave maximum net returns of 36504/ha compared to farmers’ practice.
- Treatment
- Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrientse5
- Outcome
- net returnse5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 36504/hae5
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee5
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e5“Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrients gave maximum net returns ( 36504/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.72) and higher yield (2899 kg/ha) compared to farmers’ practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic and inorganic fertilisers with micronutrients gave maximum sustainable yield index value of 0.72 compared to farmers’ practice.
- Treatment
- Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrientse5
- Outcome
- sustainable yield index valuee5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 0.72e5
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee5
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e5“Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrients gave maximum net returns ( 36504/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.72) and higher yield (2899 kg/ha) compared to farmers’ practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic and inorganic fertilisers with micronutrients gave higher yield of 2899 kg/ha compared to farmers’ practice.
- Treatment
- Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrientse5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 2899 kg/hae5
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee5
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e5“Application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with micronutrients gave maximum net returns ( 36504/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.72) and higher yield (2899 kg/ha) compared to farmers’ practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergent alachlor with one hand weeding gave lower weed menace in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae6
- Treatment
- Pre-emergent application of alachlor @ 2.5 lt/hae6
- Outcome
- weed menacee6
- Direction
- lowere6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Pre-emergent application of alachlor @ 2.5 lt/ha along with one hand weeding recorded lower weed menace and higher groundnut pod yield (499 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergent alachlor with one hand weeding gave higher groundnut pod yield of 499 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae6
- Treatment
- Pre-emergent application of alachlor @ 2.5 lt/hae6
- Outcome
- groundnut pod yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 499 kg/hae6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Pre-emergent application of alachlor @ 2.5 lt/ha along with one hand weeding recorded lower weed menace and higher groundnut pod yield (499 kg/ha)”
The same questions in other papers
alachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →alachlor · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →irrigation · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →herbicide · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
127 papers more in this group
See all 131 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
226 papers more in this group
See all 230 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.