Abstract
Field studies in 1990 and 1991 at six locations in Georgia and one location in North Carolina evaluated AC 263,222 for weed control, peanut tolerance, and yield. AC 263,222 applied early postemergence at 71 g ai ha −1 controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common lambsquarters, Ipomoea species, prickly sida, sicklepod, smallflower morningglory, and yellow nutsedge at least 91%. AC 263,222 controlled common cocklebur 77% and Florida beggarweed from 47 to 100%. Crop injury was 4% for AC 263,222 applied once and 12% or less from two applications. Mixtures of bentazon with AC 263,222 did not improve control compared to AC 263,222 alone. Imazethapyr did not improve control of AC 263,222 systems. In several locations, bentazon reduced control of Florida beggarweed with AC 263,222 when applied in a mixture compared to AC 263,222 alone. Weed control from the standard of paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence followed by paraquat, bentazon plus 2,4-DB applied POST did not provide the level or spectrum of weed control as AC 263,222 systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 controlled eight listed weeds at least 91%.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- AC 263,222 applied early postemergence at 71 g ai ha −1e0
- Outcome
- controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common lambsquarters, Ipomoea species, prickly sida, sicklepod, smallflower morningglory, and yellow nutsedgee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 91%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AC 263,222 applied early postemergence at 71 g ai ha −1 controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common lambsquarters, Ipomoea species, prickly sida, sicklepod, smallflower morningglory, and yellow nutsedge at least 91%.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 controlled common cocklebur 77%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- AC 263,222e0
- Interactor
- common cocklebure0weed
- Outcome
- common cocklebure0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 77%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AC 263,222 controlled common cocklebur 77%”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 controlled Florida beggarweed from 47 to 100%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweed
Desmodium tortuosume0weed - Outcome
- Florida beggarweede0
- Value
- 47 to 100%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Florida beggarweed from 47 to 100%”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
One AC 263,222 application caused 4% crop injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- AC 263,222 applied oncee0
- Outcome
- Crop injurye0
- Value
- 4%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Crop injury was 4% for AC 263,222 applied once and 12% or less from two applications.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Two AC 263,222 applications caused at most 12% crop injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- two applicationse0
- Outcome
- Crop injurye0
- Value
- 12% or lesse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Crop injury was 4% for AC 263,222 applied once and 12% or less from two applications.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding bentazon did not improve weed control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Mixtures of bentazon with AC 263,222e0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
- Comparator
- AC 263,222 alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixtures of bentazon with AC 263,222 did not improve control compared to AC 263,222 alone.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr did not improve AC 263,222 control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
- Comparator
- AC 263,222 systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Imazethapyr did not improve control of AC 263,222 systems.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Bentazon mixtures reduced Florida beggarweed control in several locations.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- bentazone0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweedDesmodium tortuosume0weed
- Outcome
- control of Florida beggarweede0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- AC 263,222 alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In several locations, bentazon reduced control of Florida beggarweed with AC 263,222 when applied in a mixture compared to AC 263,222 alone.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
The paraquat plus bentazon standard had lower weed-control level and spectrum than AC 263,222 systems.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence followed by paraquat, bentazon plus 2,4-DB applied POSTe0
- Outcome
- level or spectrum of weed controle0
- Direction
- did not providee0
- Comparator
- AC 263,222 systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control from the standard of paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence followed by paraquat, bentazon plus 2,4-DB applied POST did not provide the level or spectrum of weed control as AC 263,222 systems.”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
paraquat · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
imazapic · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →bentazone · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →bentazone · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Imazethapyr · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →bentazone · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imazapic · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.