Paper · 1995 · Peanut Science

Response of Eight Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars to the Herbicide AC 263,222

John S. Richburg; John W. Wilcut; Albert K. Culbreath; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments conducted in 1992 and 1993 in Georgia evaluated the response of the peanut cultivars Florunner, Georgia Runner, Goldkist GK 7, NC 7, NC-V11, Southern Runner, Sunrunner, and AgraTech VC-1 to AC 263,222 applied early-postemergence (EPOST) at 71 g ha-1. Visual injury, which was less than 13%, was independent of cultivar, and injury was not evident on any cultivar midseason. AC 263,222 slightly reduced canopy width consistently on all cultivars. The only significant effect on percentage fancy pods, medium, No. 1, sound splits, damaged, and other kernels was the main effect of cultivar. There was a significant cultivar, AC 263,222, and cultivar-by-AC 263,222 effect on extra large kernels (ELK) and jumbo kernel percentages. Southern Runner and NC-V11 had significantly lower percentage jumbo and ELK, respectively when treated with AC 263,222. In addition, Florunner and Sunrunner also had numerically less percentage jumbo kernels. Reductions in percentages of ELK and jumbo were probably the result of AC 263,222-induced maturity delays. However, these reductions were not reflected in peanut yields. The occurence of late and early leaf spot, tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), and southern stem rot was independent of both cultivar and AC 263,222.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visual injury from AC 263,222 was below 13% and independent of cultivar.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
AC 263,222 applied early-postemergence (EPOST) at 71 g ha-1e0
Outcome
Visual injurye1
Direction
independent of cultivare1
Value
less than 13%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“AC 263,222 applied early-postemergence (EPOST) at 71 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Visual injury, which was less than 13%, was independent of cultivar, and injury was not evident on any cultivar midseason”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AC 263,222 slightly reduced canopy width on all cultivars.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
AC 263,222e2
Outcome
canopy widthe2
Direction
slightly reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“AC 263,222 slightly reduced canopy width consistently on all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–471 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar was the only significant main effect on percentage fancy pods, medium and No. 1 kernels.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cultivare3
Outcome
percentage fancy pods, medium, No. 1e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“The only significant effect on percentage fancy pods, medium, No. 1, sound splits, damaged, and other kernels was the main effect of cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–614 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar was the only significant main effect on sound splits, damaged and other kernels.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cultivare3
Outcome
sound splits, damaged, and other kernelse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“The only significant effect on percentage fancy pods, medium, No. 1, sound splits, damaged, and other kernels was the main effect of cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–614 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, AC 263,222 and their interaction had significant effects on extra large and jumbo kernel percentages.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cultivare4
Treatment
AC 263,222e4
Outcome
extra large kernels (ELK) and jumbo kernel percentagese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was a significant cultivar, AC 263,222, and cultivar-by-AC 263,222 effect on extra large kernels (ELK) and jumbo kernel percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Southern Runner had a significantly lower percentage of jumbo kernels when treated with AC 263,222.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
Southern Runnere5
Treatment
AC 263,222e5
Outcome
percentage jumboe5
Direction
lowere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e5

“Southern Runner and NC-V11 had significantly lower percentage jumbo and ELK, respectively when treated with AC 263,222”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NC-V11 had a significantly lower percentage of extra large kernels when treated with AC 263,222.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
NC-V11e5
Treatment
AC 263,222e5
Outcome
ELKe5
Direction
lowere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e5

“Southern Runner and NC-V11 had significantly lower percentage jumbo and ELK, respectively when treated with AC 263,222”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–873 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florunner and Sunrunner numerically had less jumbo kernels.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
Florunner and Sunrunnere6
Outcome
percentage jumbo kernelse6
Direction
lesse6
Qualifier
numericallye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e6

“Florunner and Sunrunner also had numerically less percentage jumbo kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–962 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reductions in extra large and jumbo kernel percentages were probably caused by AC 263,222-induced maturity delays.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
Reductions in percentages of ELK and jumboe7
Qualifier
AC 263,222-induced maturity delayse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e7

“Reductions in percentages of ELK and jumbo were probably the result of AC 263,222-induced maturity delays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reductions in kernel percentages were not reflected in peanut yields.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
AC 263,222e0
Outcome
peanut yieldse1
Direction
not reflectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“AC 263,222 applied early-postemergence (EPOST) at 71 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, these reductions were not reflected in peanut yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late and early leaf spot and tomato spotted wilt virus occurrence was independent of cultivar and AC 263,222.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cultivare1
Treatment
AC 263,222e1
Interactor
late and early leaf spote1pathogen
Second interactor
tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)Orthotospovirus tomatomaculaee1pathogen
Outcome
occurence of late and early leaf spote1
Direction
independent ofe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“The occurence of late and early leaf spot, tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), and southern stem rot was independent of both cultivar and AC 263,222”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1280 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Southern stem rot occurrence was independent of cultivar and AC 263,222.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cultivare1
Treatment
AC 263,222e1
Interactor
southern stem rote1pathogen
Outcome
southern stem rote1
Direction
independent ofe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“The occurence of late and early leaf spot, tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), and southern stem rot was independent of both cultivar and AC 263,222”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1280 · show in text ↑

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

imazapic · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.