Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.

A claim from Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.

Treatment
all imazapic ratese5
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
non-treated controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
e5

“Flumioxazin did not have an effect on yield while all imazapic rates reduced yields when compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1057

Title

Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence

W. J. Grichar; P. A. Dotray; M. R. Baring International Journal of Agronomy 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/371847

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-7b71bba06a4e561233774080f69adbcb659f2521f8288451a9dddd9ba35f887a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
    Imazapic gave higher yields in 2000.

    Conservation Tillage and Herbicide Management for Two Peanut Cultivars · 2005 · compared with paraquat plus acifluorfen plus bentazon

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.