Abstract
Experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the weed control effectiveness from several rates of AC 263,222 applied PPI and PRE (36 and 72 g ai/ha), early POST (EPOST) (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), POST (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), and EPOST followed by (fb) POST (27 fb 27 g/ha or 36 fb 36 g/ha). These treatments were compared to the commercial standard of bentazon at 0.28 kg ai/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha EPOST fb bentazon at 0.56 kg/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg/ha plus 2,4-DB at 0.28 kg ae/ha. Application method had little effect on weed control with AC 263,222. In contrast, application rate affected control. Purple nutsedge, yellow nutsedge, prickly sida, smallflower morningglory, bristly starbur, common cocklebur, and coffee senna were controlled at least 82% with AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha (one-half the maximum registered use rate) regardless of application method. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%, and Ipomoea morningglory species 89 to 99%. A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB. All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Application method had little effect on weed control.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Application methode0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- little effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“Application method had little effect on weed control with AC 263,222”
Claim · model-written summary
Application rate affected weed control.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- application ratee0
- Outcome
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“In contrast, application rate affected control”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha controlled seven named weeds at least 82% across application methods.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- AC 263,222 at 36 g/hae0
- Outcome
- were controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 82%e0
- Qualifier
- regardless of application methode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“Purple nutsedge, yellow nutsedge, prickly sida, smallflower morningglory, bristly starbur, common cocklebur, and coffee senna were controlled at least 82% with AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha (one-half the maximum registered use rate) regardless of application method”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- AC 263,222 at 72 g/hae0
- Interactor
- sicklepode0weed
- Outcome
- sicklepode0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 84 to 93%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- AC 263,222 at 72 g/hae0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweed
Desmodium tortuosume0weed - Outcome
- Florida beggarweede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 65 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%”
Claim · model-written summary
AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Ipomoea morningglory species 89 to 99%.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- AC 263,222 at 72 g/hae0
- Interactor
- Ipomoea morningglory speciese0weed
- Outcome
- Ipomoea morningglory speciese0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 89 to 99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%, and Ipomoea morningglory species 89 to 99%”
Claim · model-written summary
A single AC 263,222 application at 36 g/ha or more controlled most weeds at least as well as sequential standard herbicides.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or moree0
- Outcome
- all weedse0
- Direction
- as well or greatere0
- Qualifier
- with the exception of Florida beggarweede0
- Comparator
- sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DBe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB”
Claim · model-written summary
POST AC 263,222 rates produced better yields than pendimethalin control.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- All rates of AC 263,222 applied POSTe0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control”
Claim · model-written summary
All application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha produced better yields than pendimethalin control.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/hae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control”
The same questions in other papers
imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →imazapic · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imazapic · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →imazapic · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.