imazapic · Yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
24 claims from these papers; 23 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 6
6 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of Imazapic and 2,4-DB on Peanut Yield, Grade, and Seed Germination (2010)
no changeImazapic did not affect peanut yield or grade.
Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence (2013)decreaseAll imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Response of Eight Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars to the Herbicide AC 263,222 (1995)
decreaseThe reductions in kernel percentages were not reflected in peanut yields.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseImazapic-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of Imazapic Application Timing on Texas Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 (2001)
no changeImazapic treatments did not reduce peanut yield or grade at harvest.
Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence (2013)decreaseAll imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of Imazapic and 2,4-DB on Peanut Yield, Grade, and Seed Germination (2010)
no changeImazapic did not affect peanut yield or grade.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseImazapic-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of Imazapic Application Timing on Texas Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 (2001)
no changeImazapic treatments did not reduce peanut yield or grade at harvest.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseImazapic-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence (2013)
decreaseAll imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.
Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1 (2002)increaseImazapic-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
23 citations between these papers: 13 on the same side, 10 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 15
Imidazolinone Herbicide Systems for Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 1994
- positive
AC 263,222 and Imazethapyr Rates and Mixtures for Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) · 1995
- positive
Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut as Affected by Imazameth and Imazethapyr Application Timing1 · 1997
- positive
Influence of AC 263,222 Rate and Application Method on Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) · 1997
- positive
- positive
Imazapic-Based Herbicide Systems for Peanut and Factors Affecting Activity on Florida Beggarweed · 2000
- positive
- positive
- positive
Conservation Tillage and Herbicide Management for Two Peanut Cultivars · 2005
- positive
Using Herbicides in a Peanut Strip‐tillage Production System · 2005
- positive
- positive
- positive
Weed Management Using Reduced Rate Combinations of Diclosulam, Flumioxazin, and Imazapic in Peanut · 2009
- positive
Weed Management in Peanut with Herbicide Combinations Containing Imazapic and Other Pesticides · 2009
- positive
- no effect
Annual Grass Control in Strip-Tillage Peanut Production with Delayed Applications of Pendimethalin · 2010
- positive
Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
Response of Eight Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars to the Herbicide AC 263,222 · 1995
- no effect
Effect of Imazapic Application Timing on Texas Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 · 2001
- no effect
- no effect
Effect of Imazapic and 2,4-DB on Peanut Yield, Grade, and Seed Germination · 2010
- no effect
Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence · 2013
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.