Abstract
Experiments were conducted during 2000 and 2001 at a total of 13 locations throughout Alabama, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, and Texas to evaluate efficacy of herbicides at or below the manufacturer's suggested use rate. Herbicide applications included diclosulam and flumioxazin applied PRE alone or followed by imazapic applied early postemergence (EPOST). All possible combinations of diclosulam at 0, 13.5, or 27 g ai/ha and flumioxazin at 0, 53, or 105 g ai/ha applied PRE were included. Imazapic was applied at 35 g ai/ha. Ivyleaf morningglory was controlled more than 87% when imazapic was applied EPOST regardless of PRE herbicide. Pitted morningglory control > 67% was observed with applications of diclosulam (27 g/ha) followed by imazapic, diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (53 g/ha), diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha), and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha). Sicklepod was controlled more than 74% with flumioxazin (53 g/ha) followed by imazapic and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha) followed by imazapic. Florida beggarweed was controlled more than 84% by all PRE herbicide combinations except flumioxazin (53 g/ha) alone or diclosulam (27 g/ha) alone or with imazapic. Yellow nutsedge was controlled at least 90% with diclosulam at either rate followed by imazapic and by diclosulam plus flumioxazin followed by imazapic regardless of rate. Pod yield was generally higher when herbicides were applied regardless of herbicide combination or rate. Peanut yield was maximized with the lowest rates of flumioxazin or diclosulam PRE followed by imazapic EPOST.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Early postemergence imazapic controlled ivyleaf morningglory by more than 87% across PRE herbicides.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- imazapic was applied EPOSTe0
- Interactor
- Ivyleaf morningglory
Ipomoea hederaceae0weed - Outcome
- Ivyleaf morningglory was controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- more than 87%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Ivyleaf morningglory was controlled more than 87% when imazapic was applied EPOST regardless of PRE herbicide.”
Claim · model-written summary
The listed diclosulam and flumioxazin regimens controlled pitted morningglory by more than 67%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- diclosulam (27 g/ha) followed by imazapice0
- Interactor
- Pitted morningglorye0weed
- Outcome
- Pitted morningglory controle0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- > 67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Pitted morningglory control > 67% was observed with applications of diclosulam (27 g/ha) followed by imazapic, diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (53 g/ha), diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha), and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin followed by imazapic and the three-herbicide combination controlled sicklepod by more than 74%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- flumioxazin (53 g/ha) followed by imazapice0
- Interactor
- Sicklepode0weed
- Outcome
- Sicklepod was controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- more than 74%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Sicklepod was controlled more than 74% with flumioxazin (53 g/ha) followed by imazapic and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha) followed by imazapic.”
Claim · model-written summary
Most PRE herbicide combinations controlled Florida beggarweed by more than 84%, subject to stated exceptions.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- all PRE herbicide combinationse0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweed
Desmodium tortuosume0weed - Outcome
- Florida beggarweed was controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- more than 84%e0
- Qualifier
- except flumioxazin (53 g/ha) alone or diclosulam (27 g/ha) alone or with imazapice0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Florida beggarweed was controlled more than 84% by all PRE herbicide combinations except flumioxazin (53 g/ha) alone or diclosulam (27 g/ha) alone or with imazapic.”
Claim · model-written summary
Diclosulam followed by imazapic, with or without flumioxazin, controlled yellow nutsedge by at least 90%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- diclosulam at either rate followed by imazapice0
- Interactor
- Yellow nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- Yellow nutsedge was controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 90%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Yellow nutsedge was controlled at least 90% with diclosulam at either rate followed by imazapic and by diclosulam plus flumioxazin followed by imazapic regardless of rate.”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide application generally increased peanut pod yield regardless of combination or rate.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- herbicides were appliede0
- Outcome
- Pod yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Pod yield was generally higher when herbicides were applied regardless of herbicide combination or rate.”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest PRE flumioxazin or diclosulam rates followed by EPOST imazapic maximized peanut yield.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- lowest rates of flumioxazin or diclosulam PRE followed by imazapic EPOSTe0
- Outcome
- Peanut yielde0
- Direction
- maximizede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Peanut yield was maximized with the lowest rates of flumioxazin or diclosulam PRE followed by imazapic EPOST.”
The same questions in other papers
imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →flumioxazin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →flumioxazin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Diclosulam · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imazapic · Ipomoea hederacea · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
herbicide · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.