Abstract
Field studies were conducted during 2009 and 2010 in Texas at Yoakum and Lamesa to determine peanut cultivar response to flumioxazin applied preemergence (0.053, 0.107, and 0.214 kg ai ha −1 ) and imazapic applied postemergence (0.035, 0.071, and 0.141 kg ai ha −1 ). At Yoakum, two cultivars (Tamrun OL01, Tamrun OL07) were evaluated while at Lamesa, four cultivars (FlavorRunner 458, Tamrun OL01, Tamrun OL02, and Tamrun OL07) were evaluated. In 2009, no stunting was noted at Yoakum with any herbicide regardless of cultivar. At Lamesa, FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01 were stunted at least 6% with the 0.21 kg ha −1 rate of flumioxazin and 6 to 17% with the 0.07 and 0.14 kg ha −1 rate of imazapic. Tamrun OL02 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (5%) and imazapic (5 to 18%) while Tamrun OL07 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (6 to 12%) and imazapic (7 to 15%) with the exception of flumioxazin at 0.05 kg ha −1 . Flumioxazin did not have an effect on yield while all imazapic rates reduced yields when compared with the non-treated control. In 2010 at Yoakum, little (<2%) or no herbicide stunting was noted on any cultivar and only imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 caused significant stunting (7%). No yield differences were noted between herbicides regardless of cultivar. At Lamesa, all cultivars were affected (6 to 9% stunting) by herbicide treatments. No peanut stunting was noted with flumioxazin at 0.05 kg ha −1 while imazapic at 0.04 kg ha −1 and flumioxazin at 0.11 kg ha −1 resulted in 4 and 6% stunting, respectively. Flumioxazin at 0.21 kg ha −1 and imazapic at 0.07 kg ha −1 resulted in 12% stunting and imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 stunted peanut 19%. Both Tamrun OL01 and Tamrun OL07 produced lower yields (≤6369 kg ha −1 ) than FlavorRunner 458 (7252 kg ha −1 ). Tamrun OL02 yields were intermediate (6889 kg ha −1 ). Peanut yields from herbicide treatments were not different from the non-treated control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
No stunting of peanut was noted at Yoakum in 2009 with any herbicide, regardless of cultivar.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- any herbicidee1
- Outcome
- stuntinge1
- Setting
- Yoakume1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“In 2009, no stunting was noted at Yoakum with any herbicide regardless of cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
At Lamesa, FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01 were stunted at least 6% by 0.21 kg/ha flumioxazin.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01e2
- Treatment
- 0.21 kg ha −1 rate of flumioxazine2
- Outcome
- stuntede2
- Value
- at least 6%e2
- Setting
- Lamesae2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e2“At Lamesa, FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01 were stunted at least 6% with the 0.21 kg ha −1 rate of flumioxazin and 6 to 17% with the 0.07 and 0.14 kg ha −1 rate of imazapic”
Claim · model-written summary
At Lamesa, FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01 were stunted 6 to 17% by 0.07 and 0.14 kg/ha imazapic.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01e2
- Treatment
- 0.07 and 0.14 kg ha −1 rate of imazapice2
- Outcome
- stuntede2
- Value
- 6 to 17%e2
- Setting
- Lamesae2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e2“At Lamesa, FlavorRunner 458 and Tamrun OL01 were stunted at least 6% with the 0.21 kg ha −1 rate of flumioxazin and 6 to 17% with the 0.07 and 0.14 kg ha −1 rate of imazapic”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL02 was stunted 5% by all rates of flumioxazin.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL02e3
- Treatment
- all rates of flumioxazine3
- Outcome
- stuntede3
- Value
- 5%e3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e3“Tamrun OL02 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (5%) and imazapic (5 to 18%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL02 was stunted 5 to 18% by imazapic.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL02e3
- Treatment
- imazapice3
- Outcome
- stuntede3
- Value
- 5 to 18%e3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e3“Tamrun OL02 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (5%) and imazapic (5 to 18%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL07 was stunted 6 to 12% by all rates of flumioxazin.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL07e4
- Treatment
- all rates of flumioxazine4
- Outcome
- stuntede4
- Value
- 6 to 12%e4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e4“Tamrun OL07 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (6 to 12%) and imazapic (7 to 15%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL07 was stunted 7 to 15% by imazapic.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL07e4
- Treatment
- imazapice4
- Outcome
- stuntede4
- Value
- 7 to 15%e4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e4“Tamrun OL07 was stunted by all rates of flumioxazin (6 to 12%) and imazapic (7 to 15%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin had no effect on peanut yield.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Flumioxazine5
- Outcome
- yielde5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e5“Flumioxazin did not have an effect on yield while all imazapic rates reduced yields when compared with the non-treated control”
Claim · model-written summary
All imazapic rates reduced peanut yields compared with the non-treated control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- all imazapic ratese5
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Comparator
- non-treated controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e5“Flumioxazin did not have an effect on yield while all imazapic rates reduced yields when compared with the non-treated control”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2010 at Yoakum, little or no herbicide stunting (<2%) was noted on any cultivar.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- any cultivare6
- Treatment
- herbicidee6
- Outcome
- stuntinge6
- Value
- <2%e6
- Setting
- Yoakume6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e6“In 2010 at Yoakum, little (<2%) or no herbicide stunting was noted on any cultivar and only imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 caused significant stunting (7%)”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2010 at Yoakum, only imazapic at 0.14 kg/ha caused significant stunting of 7%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1e6
- Outcome
- stuntinge6
- Value
- 7%e6
- Setting
- Yoakume6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e6“In 2010 at Yoakum, little (<2%) or no herbicide stunting was noted on any cultivar and only imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 caused significant stunting (7%)”
Claim · model-written summary
No yield difference between herbicides was noted in 2010 at Yoakum, regardless of cultivar.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- herbicidese7
- Outcome
- yielde7
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e7“No yield differences were noted between herbicides regardless of cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
At Lamesa in 2010, all peanut cultivars were stunted 6 to 9% by herbicide treatments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- all cultivarse1
- Treatment
- herbicide treatmentse1
- Outcome
- stuntinge1
- Value
- 6 to 9%e1
- Setting
- Lamesae1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“At Lamesa, all cultivars were affected (6 to 9% stunting) by herbicide treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
No peanut stunting was noted with flumioxazin at 0.05 kg/ha at Lamesa.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- flumioxazin at 0.05 kg ha −1e1
- Outcome
- stuntinge1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“No peanut stunting was noted with flumioxazin at 0.05 kg ha −1 while imazapic at 0.04 kg ha −1 and flumioxazin at 0.11 kg ha −1 resulted in 4 and 6% stunting, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazapic at 0.04 kg/ha and flumioxazin at 0.11 kg/ha resulted in 4 and 6% stunting at Lamesa, respectively.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazapic at 0.04 kg ha −1 and flumioxazin at 0.11 kg ha −1e1
- Outcome
- stuntinge1
- Value
- 4 and 6%e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“No peanut stunting was noted with flumioxazin at 0.05 kg ha −1 while imazapic at 0.04 kg ha −1 and flumioxazin at 0.11 kg ha −1 resulted in 4 and 6% stunting, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin at 0.21 kg/ha and imazapic at 0.07 kg/ha each resulted in 12% stunting at Lamesa.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Flumioxazin at 0.21 kg ha −1 and imazapic at 0.07 kg ha −1e1
- Outcome
- stuntinge1
- Value
- 12%e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“Flumioxazin at 0.21 kg ha −1 and imazapic at 0.07 kg ha −1 resulted in 12% stunting and imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 stunted peanut 19%”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazapic at 0.14 kg/ha stunted peanut 19%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1e1
- Outcome
- stuntede1
- Value
- 19%e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“Flumioxazin at 0.21 kg ha −1 and imazapic at 0.07 kg ha −1 resulted in 12% stunting and imazapic at 0.14 kg ha −1 stunted peanut 19%”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL01 and Tamrun OL07 produced lower yields than FlavorRunner 458, at 6369 kg/ha or less.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL01 and Tamrun OL07e1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Value
- ≤6369 kg ha −1e1
- Comparator
- FlavorRunner 458e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“Both Tamrun OL01 and Tamrun OL07 produced lower yields (≤6369 kg ha −1 ) than FlavorRunner 458 (7252 kg ha −1 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Tamrun OL02 yields were intermediate, at 6889 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Tamrun OL02e1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Value
- 6889 kg ha −1e1
- Qualifier
- intermediatee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“Tamrun OL02 yields were intermediate (6889 kg ha −1 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut yields from herbicide treatments were not different from the non-treated control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- herbicide treatmentse1
- Outcome
- Peanut yieldse1
- Comparator
- non-treated controle1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut Cultivar Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preemergence and Imazapic Applied Postemergence”
e1“Peanut yields from herbicide treatments were not different from the non-treated control”
The same questions in other papers
imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →flumioxazin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →imazapic · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →flumioxazin · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
226 papers more in this group
See all 230 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.