Claim · model-written summary
All application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha produced better yields than pendimethalin control.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/hae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control”
Title
Influence of AC 263,222 Rate and Application Method on Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
Theodore M. Webster; John W. Wilcut; Harold D. Coble Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00045358
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Application method had little effect on weed control.
- Association Application rate affected weed control.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha controlled seven named weeds at least 82% across application methods.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%.
- Intervention effect AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Ipomoea morningglory species 89 to 99%.
- Intervention effect A single AC 263,222 application at 36 g/ha or more controlled most weeds at least as well as sequential standard herbicides.
- Intervention effect POST AC 263,222 rates produced better yields than pendimethalin control.