Paper · 2013 · Peanut Science

Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata) Density, Biomass and Seed Production in Peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) Following Regrowth Due to Inadequate Control

A. J. Price; C. D. Monks; J. A. Kelton

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A field experiment evaluated simulated salvage herbicide application injury and injury timing on cutleaf groundcherry density, biomass, seed production, and crop yield in a peanut system. Treatments included: 1) a non-treated control; 2) hand pruning; 3) diclosulam applied preemergence (PRE) alone at 27 g/ha ; 4) paraquat applied at cracking early postemergence (EPOST) at 140 g/ha followed by bentazon at 560 g/ha late postemergence (POST) alone or mixed with 5) 2,4-DB at 220 g/ha; 6) acifluorfen at 280 g/ha; 7) imazapic at 70 g/ha; or 8) chlorimuron ethyl at 9 g/ha. Hand pruning and POST herbicide treatments were performed at 1-week intervals for four weeks beginning in June of each year. Herbicide treatments do not reflect current peanut herbicide recommendations but were chosen based on likely differential cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed production. Diclosulam applied PRE provided season-long cutleaf groundcherry control; imazapic applied POST in combination with bentazon also provided excellent control. Use of bentazon alone or mixed with chlorimuron ethyl, or hand pruning resulted in similar cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed production compared to the non-treated control in almost all comparisons. Peanut yield reflected early-season weed interference and late season cutleaf groundcherry control. Highest yields were recorded for diclosulam PRE and POST applications containing 2,4-DB and imazapic with 6040, 5990, and 6430 kg/ha, respectively. When early-season weed control efforts fail to completely control cutleaf groundcherry, it is crucial to have effective late season herbicide options for salvage treatments in order to prevent additions to the seed bank. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen, bentazon, chlorimuron ethyl, diclosulam, imazapic, paraquat, 2,4-DB, cutleaf groundcherry, Physalis angulata (L.) PHYAN, peanut, Arachis hypogaea (L.).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE diclosulam provided season-long groundcherry control.

Treatment
Diclosulam applied PREe0
Interactor
cutleaf groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
cutleaf groundcherry controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclosulam applied PRE provided season-long cutleaf groundcherry control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST imazapic with bentazon provided excellent groundcherry control.

Treatment
imazapic applied POST in combination with bentazone0
Interactor
cutleaf groundcherryt0weed
Outcome
excellent controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazapic applied POST in combination with bentazon also provided excellent control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“cutleaf groundcherry”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon alone gave groundcherry biomass and seed production similar to untreated controls.

Treatment
bentazon alonee0
Interactor
cutleaf groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed productione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of bentazon alone or mixed with chlorimuron ethyl, or hand pruning resulted in similar cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed production compared to the non-treated control in almost all comparisons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon with chlorimuron ethyl gave groundcherry biomass and seed production similar to untreated controls.

Treatment
bentazon alone or mixed with chlorimuron ethyle0
Interactor
cutleaf groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed productione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of bentazon alone or mixed with chlorimuron ethyl, or hand pruning resulted in similar cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed production compared to the non-treated control in almost all comparisons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand pruning gave groundcherry biomass and seed production similar to untreated controls.

Treatment
hand pruninge0
Interactor
cutleaf groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed productione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of bentazon alone or mixed with chlorimuron ethyl, or hand pruning resulted in similar cutleaf groundcherry biomass and subsequent seed production compared to the non-treated control in almost all comparisons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield was associated with early weed interference and late groundcherry control.

Interactor
cutleaf groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut yield reflected early-season weed interference and late season cutleaf groundcherry control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE diclosulam yielded 6040 kg/ha peanut.

Treatment
diclosulam PREe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
6040e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were recorded for diclosulam PRE and POST applications containing 2,4-DB and imazapic with 6040, 5990, and 6430 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST 2,4-DB yielded 5990 kg/ha peanut.

Treatment
POST applications containing 2,4-DBe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
5990, and 6430 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were recorded for diclosulam PRE and POST applications containing 2,4-DB and imazapic with 6040, 5990, and 6430 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST imazapic yielded 6430 kg/ha peanut.

Treatment
imazapice0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
6430 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were recorded for diclosulam PRE and POST applications containing 2,4-DB and imazapic with 6040, 5990, and 6430 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Effective late-season salvage herbicides are recommended to avoid additions to the groundcherry seed bank.

Outcome
effective late season herbicide options for salvage treatmentse0
Qualifier
prevent additions to the seed banke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is crucial to have effective late season herbicide options for salvage treatments in order to prevent additions to the seed bank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

bentazone · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Diclosulam · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

bentazone · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

pruning · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

herbicide · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.