Abstract
Research was conducted in North Carolina to compare weed control by various rates of imazapic POST alone or following diclosulam PRE. In a second experiment, weed control by imazapic applied POST alone or with acifluoren, diclosulam, or 2,4-DB was compared. In a final experiment, yellow nutsedge control by imazapic alone and with the fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole was compared. Large crabgrass was controlled more effectively by imazapic POST than diclosulam PRE. Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and eclipta were controlled more effectively by diclosulam PRE than imazapic POST. Nodding spurge was controlled similarly by both herbicides. Few differences in control were noted when comparing imazapic rates after diclosulam PRE. Applying either diclosulam PRE or imazapic POST alone or in combination increased peanut yield over nontreated peanut in five of six experiments. Few differences in pod yield were noted when comparing imazapic rates. Acifluorfen, diclosulam, and 2,4-DB did not affect entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, nodding spurge, pitted morningglory, and yellow nutsedge control by imazapic. Eclipta control by coapplication of imazapic and diclosulam exceeded control by imazapic alone. The fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole did not affect yellow nutsedge control by imazapic.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Imazapic POST controlled large crabgrass more effectively than diclosulam PRE.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- imazapic POSTe0
- Interactor
- Large crabgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- Large crabgrass was controllede0
- Direction
- more effectivelye0
- Comparator
- diclosulam PREe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Large crabgrass was controlled more effectively by imazapic POST than diclosulam PRE.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Diclosulam PRE controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and eclipta more effectively than imazapic POST.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- diclosulam PREe0
- Interactor
- Common lambsquarters
Chenopodium albume0weed - Second interactor
- common ragweed
Ambrosia artemisiifoliae0weed - Outcome
- Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and eclipta were controllede0
- Direction
- more effectivelye0
- Qualifier
- ecliptae0
- Comparator
- imazapic POSTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and eclipta were controlled more effectively by diclosulam PRE than imazapic POST.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
The two herbicides controlled nodding spurge similarly.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- both herbicidese0
- Interactor
- Nodding spurgee0weed
- Outcome
- Nodding spurge was controllede0
- Direction
- similarlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nodding spurge was controlled similarly by both herbicides.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazapic rates after diclosulam PRE showed few differences in weed control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazapic rates after diclosulam PREe0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- Few differencese0
- Comparator
- imazapic ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Few differences in control were noted when comparing imazapic rates after diclosulam PRE.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Diclosulam PRE or imazapic POST, alone or combined, increased peanut yield over no treatment in five of six experiments.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- diclosulam PRE or imazapic POST alone or in combinatione0
- Outcome
- peanut yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- five of six experimentse0
- Comparator
- nontreated peanute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying either diclosulam PRE or imazapic POST alone or in combination increased peanut yield over nontreated peanut in five of six experiments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield showed few differences across imazapic rates.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazapic ratese0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- Few differencese0
- Comparator
- imazapic ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Few differences in pod yield were noted when comparing imazapic rates.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Acifluorfen, diclosulam, and 2,4-DB did not affect imazapic control of five named weeds.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Acifluorfen, diclosulam, and 2,4-DBe0
- Interactor
- entireleaf morningglorye0weed
- Second interactor
- large crabgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, nodding spurge, pitted morningglory, and yellow nutsedge controle0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Qualifier
- nodding spurge, pitted morningglory, and yellow nutsedgee0
- Comparator
- imazapice0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Acifluorfen, diclosulam, and 2,4-DB did not affect entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, nodding spurge, pitted morningglory, and yellow nutsedge control by imazapic.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Coapplying imazapic and diclosulam improved eclipta control over imazapic alone.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- coapplication of imazapic and diclosulame0
- Interactor
- Ecliptae0weed
- Outcome
- Eclipta controle0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- imazapic alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Eclipta control by coapplication of imazapic and diclosulam exceeded control by imazapic alone.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Four fungicides did not affect imazapic control of yellow nutsedge.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazolee0
- Interactor
- yellow nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- yellow nutsedge controle0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Comparator
- imazapice0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole did not affect yellow nutsedge control by imazapic.”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →azoxystrobin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →tebuconazole · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorothalonil · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →acifluorfen · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Diclosulam · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.