Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pigeonpea plus field bean intercropping gave higher net returns of 32415/ha.

A claim from Sustainable Dryland Technologies for Improving Productivity and Livelihood Security in Alfisols of Karnataka · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea plus field bean intercropping gave higher net returns of 32415/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping systeme2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
32415/hae2
Comparator
sole crop of pigeonpeae2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Introduction of pigeonpea + field bean (1: 1) intercropping system resulted in higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1173 kg/ha), sustainable yield index value (0.43) and net returns ( 32415/ha) compared to sole crop of pigeonpea (1093 kg/ha), field bean (461 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–954

Title

Sustainable Dryland Technologies for Improving Productivity and Livelihood Security in Alfisols of Karnataka

B.K. Ramachandrappa; M.N. Thimmegowda; A. Sathish; et al. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2015. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2015.00033.0

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-a35672a6c7f23f4e29c90cb0c740e4b0a533f859806d781ea2a23a62c54260a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.