Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfentrazone plus pendimethalin caused 4 to 49% stunting.

A claim from EFFECT OF SULFENTRAZONE APPLICATION AND COMBINATION WITH CLOMAZONE OR PENDIMETHALIN ON WEED CONTROL AND PHYTOTOXICITY IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfentrazone plus pendimethalin caused 4 to 49% stunting.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulfentrazone plus pendimethaline0
Outcome
Stuntinge1
Value
4 to 49%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“4 to 49% with sulfentrazone plus pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–923
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 121–139
t1

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 121–139
e1

“Stunting from sulfentrazone was observed at five of 18 locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–774

Title

EFFECT OF SULFENTRAZONE APPLICATION AND COMBINATION WITH CLOMAZONE OR PENDIMETHALIN ON WEED CONTROL AND PHYTOTOXICITY IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO

Loren R. Fisher; W. David Smith Tobacco Science 2001. doi:10.3381/0082-4623-45.1.30

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e9601c6f02f45dc21ea703d40c0e0f8a3ea6e683dc2b0a98dd2544df94606db5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

sulfentrazone · crop injury · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · crop injury · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.