Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Growth-room inoculation increased shoot dry weight, nitrogen percentage, total nitrogen, fixed nitrogen and symbiotic efficiency.

A claim from Chickpea Yields in Relation to Rhizobium Inoculation from Wild Chickpea at High Altitudes · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-room inoculation increased shoot dry weight, nitrogen percentage, total nitrogen, fixed nitrogen and symbiotic efficiency.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight, N %, total N, N fixed and efficiency of symbiosise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculations significantly increased shoot dry weight, N %, total N, N fixed and efficiency of symbiosis compared with the uninoculated control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–703
t0

“Chickpea Yields in Relation to Rhizobium Inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52

Title

Chickpea Yields in Relation to Rhizobium Inoculation from Wild Chickpea at High Altitudes

F. Kantar; E. Elkoca; H. Öğütcü; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1439-037x.2003.00046.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e97ff29ba1198759e0dc796e4b0de607a9f7132ab5881914aaeafac01859e83e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.