Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SAN 582 mixtures allowed half-rates of imazethapyr and sethoxydim to match full-rate weed control.

A claim from Synergism of Grass Weed Control with Postemergence Combinations of SAN 582 and Fluazifop-P, Imazethapyr, or Sethoxydim · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SAN 582 mixtures allowed half-rates of imazethapyr and sethoxydim to match full-rate weed control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Half-rates of imazethapyr and sethoxydim tank-mixed with SAN 582e0
Interactor
grass weedse0weed
Outcome
grass weedse0
Direction
as well ase0
Comparator
full rates of either herbicide applied alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Half-rates of imazethapyr and sethoxydim tank-mixed with SAN 582 controlled grass weeds as well as full rates of either herbicide applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–450
e1

“When applied POST in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1049

Title

Synergism of Grass Weed Control with Postemergence Combinations of SAN 582 and Fluazifop-P, Imazethapyr, or Sethoxydim

Robert C. Scott; David R. Shaw; Randall L. Ratliff; et al. Weed Technology 1998. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00043803

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e9cf392782da16090ceba68be61f63d925cd4429eb4c8b2d80a8fe257e94a17d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Sethoxydim · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 64 positive, 4 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.