Abstract
Field studies were conducted at two locations in Missouri in 1990 and 1991 to evaluate control of velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and cocklebur in soybean with label rates (1×) or reduced rates (0.5×) of four PPI herbicides followed with or without cultivation and POST application of one fourth (0.25×) the label rate of imazethapyr. Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POST was equivalent to a 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr. Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyr were lower than with 1× rates of PPI herbicides.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
With cultivation or postemergence imazethapyr, half rate preplant herbicides gave weed control equivalent to full rate herbicides.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POSTe0
- Outcome
- Weed controle0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Comparator
- 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyre0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POST was equivalent to a 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr”
Claim · model-written summary
With cultivation or postemergence imazethapyr, half rate preplant herbicides gave soybean yield equivalent to full rate herbicides.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POSTe0
- Outcome
- soybean yielde0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Comparator
- 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyre0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POST was equivalent to a 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr”
Claim · model-written summary
Without cultivation or postemergence imazethapyr, half rates gave lower weed control than full rates.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- Weed controle0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- 1× rates of PPI herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyr were lower than with 1× rates of PPI herbicides”
Claim · model-written summary
Without cultivation or postemergence imazethapyr, half rates gave lower soybean yield than full rates.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- soybean yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- 1× rates of PPI herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyr were lower than with 1× rates of PPI herbicides”
The same questions in other papers
imazaquin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →chlorimuron · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →metribuzin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →imazaquin · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →clomazone · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →clomazone · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →chlorimuron · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.