Claim · model-written summary
CRU increased postharvest NH4+-N and NO3–-N in surface soil versus U.
- Treatment
- CRU treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Concentrations of NH4+-N and NO3–-Ne0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- surface soil (0–20 cm)e0
- Comparator
- U treatmente0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“Concentrations of NH4+-N and NO3–-N were greater in the surface soil (0–20 cm) and lower in the deeper soil layer (40–60 cm) with CRU treatments than in the U treatment after harvest”
Title
Chang TIAN; Ming-xue SUN; Xuan ZHOU; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(21)63734-6
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased double rice yield by 11.0% relative to U.
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased double rice NUE by 13.5% relative to U.
- Observation Late rice had higher yield than early rice with CRU treatments.
- Observation Late rice had higher NUE than early rice with CRU treatments.
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased early rice yield by 6.0% versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased early rice NUE by 10.2% versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased late rice yield by 15.4% versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU1 increased late rice NUE by 13.8% versus U.
- Intervention effect Double rice yield did not differ significantly between CRU1 and CRU2.
- Intervention effect CRU treatments increased apparent residual mineral N rate versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU treatments increased apparent N recovery rate versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU treatments lowered apparent N loss versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU lowered postharvest NH4+-N and NO3–-N in deeper soil versus U.
- Intervention effect CRU provided greater economic benefit than conventional U.
- Observation CRU2 provided greater comprehensive benefits than CRU1.
- Recommendation Authors recommend CRU for rice nitrogen management.