Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T3 gave a seed yield of 2.01 q per ha, among its best yield results.

A claim from Optimization of nutrient dose for growth and yield of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. under peach based agroforestry system · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave a seed yield of 2.01 q per ha, among its best yield results.

Taxon
Silybum marianumSilybum marianume0
Treatment
50% Recommended doses of fertilizers +50% Vermicomposte2
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.01q ha−1e1
Setting
open field conditione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Silybum marianum
Silybum marianum · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production of Silybum marianum (Milk thistle) under peach plants and open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–195
e1

“seed yield ha −1 (2.01q ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–839
e2

“T3(50% Recommended doses of fertilizers +50% Vermicompost)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–422

Title

Optimization of nutrient dose for growth and yield of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. under peach based agroforestry system

Kikavi Chophi; D. R. Bhardwaj; C.L. Thakur; et al. Indian journal of agroforestry 2016

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e9f4d843a7074ee06bf0e2e899849d98db608e4bf8b01f3b920d45817906f9f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Silybum marianum (milk thistle)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.