Abstract
The results of studies of milk thistle productivity depending on soil and climatic conditions, doses and timing of mineral fertilizers, microelements, growth stimulants, plant protection products are presented. It was revealed that the formation of the assimilation apparatus and biomass is directly related to the regime of mineral nutrition, the treatment of seeds, crops with growth stimulants and plant protection products. The maximum leaf area (48.0 thousand m2/ha) and dry biomass (4.8 t/ha) were in the phase of the beginning of fruit formation when fertilizers were applied at a dose of N90P90K60 (1.50 t/ha), which is higher than the control (without fertilizers) by 0.6 t/ha (40.0%). In wet years, the increase in seed yield after the application of fertilizers was 1.2–1.5 times higher compared to years characterized by drought. Various doses of fertilizers had a significant effect on the oil content: at the optimal dose (N90P90K60), it increased to 30.2%, which is 12.0% higher than in the control. The content of flavolignans at the maximum dose of fertilizers increased to 3.70%, protein - up to 23.7% compared with the control (by 2.90 and 19.1%, respectively). The apllication of the growth stimulator Gibbersib in combination with microelements (Gumat 7) against the background of mineral fertilizers contributed to more intensive growth and development of milk thistle, and also increased the germination of both laboratory and field during the entire growing season (by 5.2–8.3%) and by the time of harvesting (by 2.8–8.2%). The highest yield of milk thistle seeds (1.06 t/ha) was after application of the complex microfertilizer Humat 7 and growth stimulator, respectively, compared with the control and moderate dose.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition and treatments were associated with assimilation apparatus and biomass.
- Taxon
- milk thistle
Silybum marianumt0 - Treatment
- regime of mineral nutritione0
- Outcome
- formation of the assimilation apparatus and biomasse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the formation of the assimilation apparatus and biomass is directly related to the regime of mineral nutrition, the treatment of seeds, crops with growth stimulants and plant protection products”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum leaf area was 48.0 thousand m2/ha under N90P90K60.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- N90P90K60e0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 48.0 thousand m2/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum leaf area (48.0 thousand m2/ha) and dry biomass (4.8 t/ha) were in the phase of the beginning of fruit formation when fertilizers were applied at a dose of N90P90K60 (1.50 t/ha)”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum dry biomass was 4.8 t/ha under N90P90K60.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- N90P90K60e0
- Outcome
- dry biomasse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 4.8 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum leaf area (48.0 thousand m2/ha) and dry biomass (4.8 t/ha) were in the phase of the beginning of fruit formation when fertilizers were applied at a dose of N90P90K60 (1.50 t/ha)”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield was 1.50 t/ha under N90P90K60, 0.6 t/ha above control.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- N90P90K60e0
- Outcome
- 1.50 t/hae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.6 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control (without fertilizers)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when fertilizers were applied at a dose of N90P90K60 (1.50 t/ha), which is higher than the control (without fertilizers) by 0.6 t/ha (40.0%)”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer yield response was 1.2–1.5 times higher in wet years than drought years.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- application of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.2–1.5 timese0
- Comparator
- years characterized by droughte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In wet years, the increase in seed yield after the application of fertilizers was 1.2–1.5 times higher compared to years characterized by drought.”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil content rose to 30.2% under N90P90K60.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- N90P90K60e0
- Outcome
- oil contente1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 30.2%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at the optimal dose (N90P90K60), it increased to 30.2%, which is 12.0% higher than in the control.”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
e1“Various doses of fertilizers had a significant effect on the oil content: at the optimal dose (N90P90K60), it increased to 30.2%, which is 12.0% higher than in the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Flavolignan content rose to 3.70% at the maximum fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- maximum dose of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- content of flavolignanse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.70%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of flavolignans at the maximum dose of fertilizers increased to 3.70%, protein - up to 23.7% compared with the control (by 2.90 and 19.1%, respectively).”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content reached 23.7% at the maximum fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- maximum dose of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 23.7%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of flavolignans at the maximum dose of fertilizers increased to 3.70%, protein - up to 23.7% compared with the control (by 2.90 and 19.1%, respectively).”
t0“productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Gibbersib with Gumat 7 increased growth and development.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianume0
- Treatment
- Gibbersib in combination with microelements (Gumat 7)e0
- Outcome
- growth and developmente0
- Direction
- more intensivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The apllication of the growth stimulator Gibbersib in combination with microelements (Gumat 7) against the background of mineral fertilizers contributed to more intensive growth and development of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Gibbersib with Gumat 7 raised germination by 5.2–8.3% over the season.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- Gibbersibe1
- Outcome
- germination of both laboratory and fielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5.2–8.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased the germination of both laboratory and field during the entire growing season (by 5.2–8.3%)”
t0“growth stimulators and means of protection on the productivity of milk thistle”
e1“The apllication of the growth stimulator Gibbersib in combination with microelements (Gumat 7) against the background of mineral fertilizers contributed to more intensive growth and development of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Germination at harvest was raised by 2.8–8.2%.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianumt0
- Treatment
- growth stimulatort0
- Outcome
- harvestinge0
- Value
- 2.8–8.2%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by the time of harvesting (by 2.8–8.2%)”
t0“growth stimulators and means of protection on the productivity of milk thistle”
Claim · model-written summary
Humat 7 and growth stimulator gave the highest seed yield, 1.06 t/ha.
- Taxon
- milk thistleSilybum marianume0
- Treatment
- complex microfertilizer Humat 7 and growth stimulatore0
- Outcome
- yield of milk thistle seedse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.06 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control and moderate dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of milk thistle seeds (1.06 t/ha) was after application of the complex microfertilizer Humat 7 and growth stimulator, respectively, compared with the control and moderate dose.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Silybum marianum (milk thistle)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
fertilization · yield · Silybum marianum (milk thistle)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.