Observationmodel-written summary

The remaining six sea beet accessions were susceptible, with damage scores from 5.2 to 7.1.

A claim from Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022 · 2023

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining six sea beet accessions were susceptible, with damage scores from 5.2 to 7.1.

Interactor
sugar beet root maggotTetanops myopaeformise1pest
Outcome
rating scorese0
Value
5.2 to 7.1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima
Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima · TaxonMeneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remained six sea beet lines were all susceptible with the rating scores ranged from 5.2 to 7.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3522–3620
e1

“sugar beet root maggot (SBRM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e9ff906d0e52b8ec4b302396ad74198ef72a0bd19cbfc3c544ace17defcfa3ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer