By interacting organism › Animals › Ulidiidae › Tetanops myopaeformis

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Deep learning predicted binding of Bv STI to nine sugar beet root maggot trypsins.

Taxon: B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Interactor: T. myopaeformisTetanops myopaeformise0
Gene: Bv STIe0
Outcome: bind 9 different T. myopaeformis trypsinse0
Value: 9e0

Verbatim

e0
“A B. vulgaris protease inhibitor, Bv STI (DV501688), one of 22 of its Kunitz trypsin inhibitors (KTIs) was shown through deep learning analyses to bind 9 different T. myopaeformis trypsins (Trps).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–548

Title

Deep learning analysis of soybean cyst nematode effectors to proven soybean resistance genes and homolog identification in the sugar beet-sugar beet root maggot plant pathosystem

Sidra S. Rahim; Yerang Lee; Nadim W. Alkharouf; et al. Data in Brief 2026. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2026.112749

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BLASTp identified sugar beet homologs of all 114 soybean defense proteins as resistance candidates against T. myopaeformis.

Taxon: B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Interactor: T. myopaeformisTetanops myopaeformise0
Outcome: sugar beet homologse0
Value: 114e0

Verbatim

e0
“BLASTp analyses of the B. vulgaris proteome with all 114 G. max defense proteins identified the sugar beet homologs as a pool of potential candidate genes to be employed to generate durable resistance to T. myopaeformis .”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1713

Title

Deep learning analysis of soybean cyst nematode effectors to proven soybean resistance genes and homolog identification in the sugar beet-sugar beet root maggot plant pathosystem

Sidra S. Rahim; Yerang Lee; Nadim W. Alkharouf; et al. Data in Brief 2026. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2026.112749

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptomic analyses identified genes related to the resistant and susceptible sugar beet responses to the root maggot.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist1
Interactor: Tetanops myopaeformisTetanops myopaeformist0pest
Outcome: genes that relate to the resistant and susceptible responsese1

Verbatim

t0
“sugar beet root maggot Tetanops myopaeformis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–84

t1
“infecting sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–107

e1
“identified genes that relate to the resistant and susceptible responses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–663

Title

Transcriptome sample statistics for the sugar beet root maggot Tetanops myopaeformis ) infecting sugar beet

Sudha Acharya; Nadim W. Alkharouf; Muhammad Massub Tehseen; et al. Bioinformation 2024. doi:10.6026/9732063002001881

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet root maggot pressure was uniform by damage on susceptible checks and border varieties.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Interactor: Sugar Beet Root MaggotTetanops myopaeformist0pest
Outcome: SBRM pressure was uniforme0

Verbatim

e0
“The SBRM pressure was uniform according to damage on roots of the susceptible check and susceptible commercial varieties on the border.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2813–2948

t0
“Sugar Beet Root Maggot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69

e1
“sugar beet nursery field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–835

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The resistant checks F1024 and F1016 had root damage ratings around 2.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Material: F1024 and F1016e0
Interactor: Sugar Beet Root MaggotTetanops myopaeformist0pest
Outcome: damage ratingse0
Value: around 2e0

Verbatim

e0
“The two resistant checks F1024 and F1016 both have damage ratings around 2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3014–3088

e1
“sugar beet nursery field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–835

t0
“Sugar Beet Root Maggot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All evaluated cultivated beet lines showed moderate to heavy maggot damage, with average ratings from 4.2 to 7.1.

Taxon: cultivated beetBeta vulgarise0
Interactor: sugar beet root maggotTetanops myopaeformise1pest
Outcome: moderate to heavy damages caused by SBRMe0
Value: 4.2 to 7.1e0

Verbatim

e0
“all lines of cultivated beet (sugar beet, fodder beet, and table beet) showed moderate to heavy damages caused by SBRM with average ratings ranged from 4.2 to 7.1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3210–3372

e1
“sugar beet root maggot (SBRM)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sea beet accession PI 518344 was resistant with a mean damage rate of 2.1.

Taxon: sea beetBeta vulgaris subsp. maritimae0
Material: PI 518344e0
Interactor: sugar beet root maggotTetanops myopaeformise1pest
Outcome: damage ratee0
Value: 2.1e0

Verbatim

e0
“Of the eight sea beet accessions, lines PI 518344 and PI 518408 were both resistant and showed a mean damage rate of 2.1 and 2.6, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3374–3516

e1
“sugar beet root maggot (SBRM)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sea beet accession PI 518408 was resistant with a mean damage rate of 2.6.

Taxon: sea beetBeta vulgaris subsp. maritimae0
Material: PI 518408e0
Interactor: sugar beet root maggotTetanops myopaeformise1pest
Outcome: damage ratee0
Value: 2.6e0

Verbatim

e0
“Of the eight sea beet accessions, lines PI 518344 and PI 518408 were both resistant and showed a mean damage rate of 2.1 and 2.6, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3374–3516

e1
“sugar beet root maggot (SBRM)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining six sea beet accessions were susceptible, with damage scores from 5.2 to 7.1.

Taxon: sea beetBeta vulgaris subsp. maritimae0
Interactor: sugar beet root maggotTetanops myopaeformise1pest
Outcome: rating scorese0
Value: 5.2 to 7.1e0

Verbatim

e0
“the remained six sea beet lines were all susceptible with the rating scores ranged from 5.2 to 7.1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3522–3620

e1
“sugar beet root maggot (SBRM)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243

Title

Evaluation of NPGS Germplasm for Resistance to Sugar Beet Root Maggot, 2022

Chenggen Chu; Barbara C Hellier; Kevin M Dorn Arthropod management tests 2023. doi:10.1093/amt/tsad002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory reared adults produced second generation third instar larvae.

Taxon: sugar beet Beta vulgaris L.Beta vulgarise1
Interactor: Tetanops myopaeformisTetanops myopaeformise2pest
Outcome: second generation of third-instar larvaee0

Verbatim

e0
“These laboratory-reared adults laid eggs and ultimately produced a second generation of third-instar larvae in the lab”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1006

e1
“sugar beet Beta vulgaris L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–129

e2
“Tetanops myopaeformis (von Röder)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–60

Title

Screening for Resistance Against the Sugarbeet Root Maggot, Tetanops myopaeformis (Diptera: Ulidiidae), Using a Greenhouse Bioassay

Tucker B Daley; Erik J Wenninger Journal of Insect Science 2018. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iey051

Other claims from this paper (5)

Tetanops myopaeformis 59 claims

59 claims