Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shoot biomass did not differ significantly between nitrate-fed and ammonium-fed tomatoes.

A claim from Effects of nitrate‐, ammonium‐, and organic‐nitrogen‐based fertilizers on growth and yield of tomatoes · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass did not differ significantly between nitrate-fed and ammonium-fed tomatoes.

Treatment
NO $ _3^- $ ‐e0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Comparator
NH $ _4^+ $ ‐fed plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in shoot biomass and yields of red tomatoes were observed between NO $ _3^- $ ‐ or NH $ _4^+ $ ‐fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1007

Title

Effects of nitrate‐, ammonium‐, and organic‐nitrogen‐based fertilizers on growth and yield of tomatoes

Anuschka Heeb; Bengt Lundegårdh; Tom Ericsson; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2005. doi:10.1002/jpln.200420420

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ea7fcbfd8bc34ecf5343e513a26c33479d554d83d3143112eb9ed3575e164d63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitric oxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.