Paper · 2025 · Discover Environment

Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide crosstalk enhances photosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation in tomato and brinjal under Cr(VI) stress

Tuba Taziun; Ritu Kumari; Abbu Zaid; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination, particularly with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)], is a growing environmental concern that severely impairs plant growth, photosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism, posing a threat to crop productivity and food security. This study investigates the individual and interactive roles of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and nitric oxide (NO) in alleviating Cr(VI) toxicity in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena ). The exposure to 20 µM Cr(VI) for seven days significantly reduced shoot/root length, biomass, photosynthetic pigment levels, and the activity of nitrogen-assimilating enzymes (NR, NiR, GS, GOGAT), with brinjal showing greater sensitivity than tomato. Supplementation with H₂O₂ or NO significantly mitigated these effects, improving growth parameters by up to 34% and restoring pigment content and nitrogen metabolism. Inhibitor-based assays revealed that H₂O₂ functions upstream of NO in the signaling cascade, as NO scavengers (c-PTIO, L-NAME) abolished H₂O₂-induced recovery, while ROS inhibitors (NAC, DPI) did not affect NO’s benefits. The novelty of this study lies in its demonstration of a hierarchical H₂O₂–NO signaling pathway that modulates nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant defense under Cr(VI) stress. These findings suggest a hierarchical H₂O₂–NO signaling mechanism that mitigates oxidative and metabolic damage under Cr(VI) stress. Among treatments, the application of SNP showed the most effective amelioration of Cr(VI) toxicity. This research provides a promising physiological strategy to enhance metal stress tolerance in solanaceous crops. Future work may explore the gene regulatory networks associated with this crosstalk for broader agricultural applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr(VI) significantly reduced shoot and root length, biomass and photosynthetic pigment levels in tomato.

Treatment
Cr(VI)e0
Outcome
shoot/root length, biomass, photosynthetic pigment levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cr(VI) for seven days significantly reduced shoot/root length, biomass, photosynthetic pigment levels, and the activity of nitrogen-assimilating enzymes (NR, NiR, GS, GOGAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–650 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal was more sensitive to Cr(VI) than tomato.

Outcome
sensitivitye1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
tomatoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e1

“with brinjal showing greater sensitivity than tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementation with H2O2 improved growth parameters of Cr(VI)-stressed plants by up to 34%.

Treatment
Supplementation with H₂O₂e2
Outcome
growth parameterse2
Direction
improvinge2
Value
34%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e2

“Supplementation with H₂O₂ or NO significantly mitigated these effects, improving growth parameters by up to 34% and restoring pigment content and nitrogen metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NO supplementation improved growth parameters of Cr(VI)-stressed plants by up to 34%.

Treatment
NOe2
Outcome
growth parameterse2
Direction
improvinge2
Value
34%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e2

“Supplementation with H₂O₂ or NO significantly mitigated these effects, improving growth parameters by up to 34% and restoring pigment content and nitrogen metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO scavengers abolished the H2O2-induced recovery under Cr(VI) stress.

Treatment
NO scavengers (c-PTIO, L-NAME)e3
Outcome
H₂O₂-induced recoverye3
Direction
abolishede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e3

“NO scavengers (c-PTIO, L-NAME) abolished H₂O₂-induced recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROS inhibitors did not affect the benefits of NO under Cr(VI) stress.

Treatment
ROS inhibitors (NAC, DPI)e4
Outcome
NO’s benefitse4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e4

“ROS inhibitors (NAC, DPI) did not affect NO’s benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1093 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 acts upstream of NO in the signalling cascade under Cr(VI) stress.

Compound
H₂O₂e5
Outcome
signaling cascadee5
Qualifier
upstream of NOe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e5

“H₂O₂ functions upstream of NO in the signaling cascade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP was the most effective treatment for ameliorating Cr(VI) toxicity.

Treatment
SNPe6
Outcome
amelioration of Cr(VI) toxicitye6
Direction
most effectivee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and brinjal ( Solanum melongena )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–453 · show in text ↑
e6

“the application of SNP showed the most effective amelioration of Cr(VI) toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1502 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

chromium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitric oxide · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitric oxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.