Abstract
Abstract Abundant studies revealed that multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are toxic to plants. However, whether or how MWCNTs influence lateral root (LR) formation, which is an important component of the adaptability of the root system to various environmental cues, remains controversial. In this report, we found that MWCNTs could enter into tomato seedling roots. The administration with MWCNTs promoted tomato LR formation in an approximately dose-dependent fashion. Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production was triggered by MWCNTs, confirmed by Greiss reagent method, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), together with the scavenger of NO. A cause-effect relationship exists between MWCNTs and NO in the induction of LR development, since MWCNT-triggered NO synthesis and LR formation were obviously blocked by the removal of endogenous NO with its scavenger. The activity of NO generating enzyme nitrate reductase (NR) was increased in response to MWCNTs. Tungstate inhibition of NR not only impaired NO production, but also abolished LR formation triggered by MWCNTs. The addition of N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester ( l -NAME), an inhibitor of mammalian nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-like enzyme, failed to influence LR formation. Collectively, we proposed that NO might act as a downstream signaling molecule in MWCNT control of LR development, at least partially via NR.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes entered tomato seedling roots.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Organ / stage
- seedling rootse0
- Outcome
- MWCNTs could enter into tomato seedling rootse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“MWCNTs could enter into tomato seedling roots”
Claim · model-written summary
MWCNT administration promoted tomato lateral root formation approximately dose dependently.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- MWCNTse0
- Outcome
- LR formatione0
- Direction
- promotede0
- Qualifier
- approximately dose-dependent fashione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The administration with MWCNTs promoted tomato LR formation in an approximately dose-dependent fashion.”
Claim · model-written summary
MWCNTs triggered endogenous nitric oxide production.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- MWCNTse0
- Outcome
- Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) productione0
- Direction
- triggerede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production was triggered by MWCNTs”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of endogenous NO blocked nanotube-triggered NO synthesis.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- removal of endogenous NO with its scavengere0
- Outcome
- MWCNT-triggered NO synthesise0
- Direction
- blockede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“MWCNT-triggered NO synthesis and LR formation were obviously blocked by the removal of endogenous NO with its scavenger”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of endogenous NO blocked nanotube-triggered lateral root formation.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- removal of endogenous NO with its scavengere0
- Outcome
- LR formatione0
- Direction
- blockede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“MWCNT-triggered NO synthesis and LR formation were obviously blocked by the removal of endogenous NO with its scavenger”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
MWCNTs increased nitrate reductase activity.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- MWCNTse0
- Gene
- nitrate reductase (NR)e0
- Outcome
- activity of NO generating enzyme nitrate reductase (NR)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The activity of NO generating enzyme nitrate reductase (NR) was increased in response to MWCNTs.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tungstate inhibition of nitrate reductase impaired NO production.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Tungstate inhibition of NRe0
- Gene
- NRe0
- Outcome
- NO productione0
- Direction
- impairede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tungstate inhibition of NR not only impaired NO production, but also abolished LR formation triggered by MWCNTs.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tungstate inhibition of nitrate reductase abolished MWCNT-triggered lateral root formation.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Tungstate inhibition of NRe0
- Gene
- NRe0
- Outcome
- LR formation triggered by MWCNTse0
- Direction
- abolishede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tungstate inhibition of NR not only impaired NO production, but also abolished LR formation triggered by MWCNTs.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The NOS-like enzyme inhibitor l-NAME failed to influence lateral root formation.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester ( l -NAME)e0
- Outcome
- LR formatione0
- Direction
- failed to influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The addition of N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester ( l -NAME), an inhibitor of mammalian nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-like enzyme, failed to influence LR formation.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose that NO acts downstream in MWCNT control of lateral root development, partly via nitrate reductase.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Gene
- NRe0
- Outcome
- LR developmente0
- Qualifier
- downstream signaling moleculee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“NO might act as a downstream signaling molecule in MWCNT control of LR development, at least partially via NR.”
t0“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
multi-walled carbon nanotube · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
nitric oxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →nitric oxide · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →tungstate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
methyl ester · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
nitrogen · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 108 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
206 papers more in this group
See all 210 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.