Claim · model-written summary
Labor was a major modeled driver of sugarcane GHG emissions, with path coefficient 0.771.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“For sugarcane and sugar beet, the path coefficient of N fertilizer were ‒0.964 and ‒0.835 and that of labor were 0.771 and 0.589, respectively.”
Title
Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and economic viability of sugar crops in China
Linsheng YANG; Xiaozhong WANG; Wushuai ZHANG; et al. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering 2023. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2023529
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Sugarcane yield increased over time.
- Observation Sugar beet yield increased over time.
- Observation Sugarcane carbon footprint rose over time.
- Observation Sugar beet carbon footprint rose over time.
- Observation The income-to-cost ratio for sugarcane declined over time.
- Observation The income-to-cost ratio for sugar beet declined over time.
- Association Nitrogen fertilizer was a major modeled driver of sugarcane GHG emissions, with path coefficient ‒0.964.
- Association Nitrogen fertilizer was a major modeled driver of sugar beet GHG emissions, with path coefficient ‒0.835.
- Association Labor was a major modeled driver of sugar beet GHG emissions, with path coefficient 0.589.
- Intervention effect An improved system is projected to reduce sugarcane GHG emissions by 32% by 2030 versus business as usual.
- Intervention effect An improved system is projected to reduce sugar beet GHG emissions by 32% by 2030 versus business as usual.
- Intervention effect An improved system is projected to reduce annual sugarcane production cost by 24% by 2030 versus business as usual.
- Intervention effect An improved system is projected to reduce annual sugar beet production cost by 24% by 2030 versus business as usual.