Claim · model-written summary
Root-knot was suppressed only with DBCP in the previous two years.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- DBCP was applied the 2 previous yearse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitat0pathogen - Outcome
- root-knote0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“root-knot was suppressed only where DBCP was applied the 2 previous years.”
t0“soybean yields and Meloidogyne incognita populations”
Title
N A Minton; M B Parker; B G Mullinix PubMed 1978
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect DBCP increased yields of four soybean cultivars.
- Intervention effect Subsoiling increased yields of four soybean cultivars.
- Observation Hutton had high resistance to M. incognita.
- Observation Essex had intermediate resistance to M. incognita.
- Observation Davis had low resistance to M. incognita.
- Observation Ransom had low resistance to M. incognita.
- Intervention effect Prior Hutton planting yielded the greatest subsequent Davis yields.
- Intervention effect Prior Essex planting yielded the greatest subsequent Davis yields.
- Intervention effect Prior DBCP treatment yielded the greatest subsequent Davis yields.
- Intervention effect Residual subsoiling effects on Davis yield were not significant.
- Observation Cultivar history had residual effects on nematode populations.
- Observation Nematicide history had residual effects on nematode populations.
- Observation Beneficial residual effects did not provide maximum soybean production.