Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reductions in ETR after herbicide application did not affect yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.

A claim from Selectivity of Herbicides Inhibitors of Photosystem II for Sugarcane Cultivars · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in ETR after herbicide application did not affect yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.

Taxon
sugarcane cultivarse1
Treatment
herbicide applicatione1
Outcome
yield and technological characteristicse1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“reductions in the ETR after herbicide application did not affect the yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1451

Title

Selectivity of Herbicides Inhibitors of Photosystem II for Sugarcane Cultivars

P.S. SIMÕES; C.A. CARBONARI; R.F. NASCENTES; et al. Planta Daninha 2016. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582016340400021

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-eaeb379c39bc2cd1fd01c4d788ad786e33ced2a5a6e9a1a4e9d1099de0efca4d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Conventional non-Buster weed control produced significantly higher yields in untransformed cane.

    Stability of Gene Expression and Agronomic Performance of a Transgenic Herbicide‐Resistant Sugarcane Line in South Africa · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Conventional herbicide treatment of untransformed cane produced significantly higher yield.

    Stability of Gene Expression and Agronomic Performance of a Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Sugarcane Line in South Africa · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    All weed control treatments increased cane yield over control.

    Soil Microflora and Weed Management as Influenced by Atrazine 50 % WP in Sugarcane · 2013 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Banded rather than broadcast herbicide reduced cost by $30.49/ha.

    Weed Control and Economics Using Reduced Tillage Programs in Sugarcane · 2006 · compared with broadcast

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Conventional hoeing and weeding gave significantly higher cane yield than all other treatments.

    Herbicidal-cum-Integrated Approach of Weed Management in Spring Planted Sugarcane · 2001 · compared with all other treatments

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Chemical weed control with one inter-row cultivation during tillering gave higher cane yield.

    Evaluation of integrated weed management practices for sugarcane. · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Herbicides significantly raised cane yield over the weedy check in both crop cycles.

    Weed dynamics and their management in sugarcane under different preceding crops and tillage systems · 2005 · compared with weedy check

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Pre emergence herbicide plots had maximum stalk height of 409 cm.

    Impact of Various Weed Control Methods on the Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane · 1998

    Opposite direction

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.