Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chemical weed control with one inter-row cultivation during tillering gave higher cane yield.

A claim from Evaluation of integrated weed management practices for sugarcane. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control with one inter-row cultivation during tillering gave higher cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
chemical weed control along with one inter-row cultivation during tilleringe4
Outcome
cane yielde4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“A field study was conducted at Sugarcane Research Institute, Faisalabad during 2008-2009 to evaluate integrated weed management for sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141
e4

“chemical weed control along with one inter-row cultivation during tillering gave higher cane yield and cost benefit ratio (1:12.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1094

Title

Evaluation of integrated weed management practices for sugarcane.

M. S. Cheema; Shahid Bashir; Fayyaz Ahmad JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH 2010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1eb6fb19e1dfd190cd79622422e2a30cb2220f355e89a653533103e89d7e3bd1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Weed-free conditions maintained beyond 120 days after planting did not significantly increase sugarcane yields.

    Studies on the Critical Period of Weed Control in Spring Planted Sugarcane1 · 1980

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Herbicide based reduced and no tillage programs cost $19.47 to $77.38/ha more.

    Efficacy and Economics of Summer Fallow Conventional and Reduced-Tillage Programs for Sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Residual effects of herbicides, hoe-weeding and the weedy check on sugarcane growth parameters and stalk yield were not significant.

    Evaluation of the Residual Effect of Cattle Manure Combinations with Inorganic Fertilizer and Chemical Weed Control on the Sustainability of Chewing Sugarcane Production at Badeggi Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Combined preemergence and postemergence treatments did not interact to reduce yields more than the sum of their separate effects.

    Tolerance of Two Sugarcane Cultivars to Terbacil, Fenac, and Dalapon · 1973 · compared with combined effects of each treatment

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Reductions in ETR after herbicide application did not affect yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.

    Selectivity of Herbicides Inhibitors of Photosystem II for Sugarcane Cultivars · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Sugarcane yield was not affected by topramezone applied alone or combined with triazine herbicides.

    Sugarcane response and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum) control with topramezone and triazine herbicides · 2019

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Total sugarcane yield over four crop years was reduced 11% for the no-till program when herbicides were broadcast, compared with conventional tillage.

    Integrated Management of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) in Sugarcane · 2013 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    The herbicides gave cane and intercrop yields and returns comparable to two hand hoeings.

    Weed management in spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)-based intercropping systems · 2006 · compared with two handhoeings

    Opposite direction

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 35 positive, 13 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Tillage and straw removal did not significantly affect sugarcane yield on sandy loam soil.

    Can reduced tillage sustain sugarcane yield and soil carbon if straw is removed? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Subsoil and within-row compost did not affect cane or sugar yield versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Sugar yields did not significantly differ among treatments under conventional tillage.

    EVALUATING COMBINATIONS OF FALLOW MANAGEMENT, CONTROLLED TRAFFIC AND TILLAGE OPTIONS IN PROTOTYPE SUGARCANE FARMING SYSTEMS AT BUNDABERG · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Soil compaction did not affect sugarcane production variables.

    Least limiting water range in assessing compaction in a Brazilian Cerrado latosol growing sugarcane · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Soil compaction significantly affected sugarcane yield.

    Effects of Machine-Induced Soil Compaction on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane · 2010

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Tillage had no significant effect on cane yield at either site.

    INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ROTATION BREAKS, TILLAGE AND N MANAGEMENT ON SUGARCANE GROWN AT BUNDABERG AND INGHAM · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    No-tillage did not reduce stalk or sugarcane yield.

    Soil fertility, nutritional status, and sugarcane yield under two systems of soil management, levels of remaining straw and chiseling of ratoons · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    No-till sugarcane productivity did not differ from the highest-yielding tillage treatments.

    Productivity and agronomic characteristics of sugarcane under different tillage systems · 2017 · compared with treatments that provided the highest yields

    Opposite direction

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.