Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting two irrigations significantly decreased thousand-grain weight, spike density and grain yield.

A claim from Effects of Irrigation Regimes and Duration of Weed Interference on Grain Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Middle Egypt · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting two irrigations significantly decreased thousand-grain weight, spike density and grain yield.

Treatment
omitting two irrigation (IR4)e0
Outcome
1000-grain weight, number of spikes m-2, grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110
e0

“omitting two irrigation (IR4) significantly decreased total density and dry weight of weeds, wheat traits, i.e. plant height, spike length, number of grains spike-1, 1000-grain weight, number of spikes m-2, grain yield and grain ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–806

Title

Effects of Irrigation Regimes and Duration of Weed Interference on Grain Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Middle Egypt

Ahmed Salah Morsy; Enas Mohamed; Sahar Farag; et al. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2020. doi:10.21608/agro.2020.32917.1217

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-eafa1f504a706d395136d7f01a89bcfd9b8797b8dcb3759c9c94717f98d8db74 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.