Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cabbage with mustard intercrop had a higher marketable yield, 226.90 q/ha.

A claim from Impact of intercrops for the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and yield on cabbage · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage with mustard intercrop had a higher marketable yield, 226.90 q/ha.

Treatment
cabbage + mustard intercrop (T₅)e2
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
226.90e2
Comparator
sole cabbagee3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“yield on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105
e2

“The cabbage + tomato intercrop (T₃) also produced the highest marketable yield (245.00 q/ha), followed by cabbage + mustard intercrop (T₅) and cabbage + marigold intercrop (T₁) with 226.90 and 216.27 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1245
e3

“whereas the lowest yield (194.68 q/ha) was recorded in the sole cabbage as untreated plot (T₈). The cabbage + tomato intercrop (T₃) also recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1392

Title

Impact of intercrops for the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and yield on cabbage

Kiran Patel; KL Painkra; PK Bhagat International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2025. doi:10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i8k.693

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-eb6aba3b11ff826511f93b8c9594e294fb7b85538d4c02bbed8044e144773fb1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Brassica oleracea var. capitata · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.