Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cabbage with tomato intercrop had the lowest seasonal mean larval population of diamondback moth, 1.20 larvae per plant.

A claim from Impact of intercrops for the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and yield on cabbage · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage with tomato intercrop had the lowest seasonal mean larval population of diamondback moth, 1.20 larvae per plant.

Treatment
cabbage + tomato intercrope0
Interactor
Plutella xylostella L.t0pest
Outcome
seasonal mean larval population of DBMe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.20 larvae/plante0
Comparator
sole cabbagee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–84
t1

“yield on cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105
e0

“The cabbage + tomato intercrop (T₃) recorded the lowest seasonal mean larval population of DBM (1.20 larvae/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–687
e4

“In contrast, sole cabbage (T₈) with 2.23 larvae/plant and crucifer-based intercrops such as cabbage + broccoli (T₄), and cabbage + cauliflower (T₂) recorded higher pest loads with 2.08 and 1.95 larvae/plant, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1039

Title

Impact of intercrops for the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and yield on cabbage

Kiran Patel; KL Painkra; PK Bhagat International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2025. doi:10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i8k.693

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5e5359e27ca0b5f4c08fca15ceabce2ef5a57a9179c5bf1b2183a9ba2a44bc50 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Solanum lycopersicum · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Brassica oleracea var. capitata · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.