Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage intercropped with tomato significantly reduced diamondback moth larval populations in both seasons.
Treatmentintercropping cabbage with tomato e0 OutcomeDBM larva population e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Second interactor Second interactor role Setting Value
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping cabbage with tomato and chilli could reduce the DBM larva population significantly in both seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–723 e1 “sole cabbage (C), cabbage intercropped with tomato (C+T) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–425 Other claims from this paper (2) Record rev-e0a5926baa86ed7b30f1534cb207967d5be79d445bc79eafa9db12d06683a91a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer
Solanum lycopersicum · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Positive and negative results 4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction
no effect positive positive See all 4 papers → Brassica oleracea var. capitata · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Positive and negative results 16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
negative negative no effect positive positive positive positive positive 7 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers → intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Positive and negative results 18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction
no effect no effect no effect positive positive positive positive positive 9 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers → Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.