Claim · model-written summary
Experimental 12-month-old wine samples were more amplified than the 18-month-old ones.
- Treatment
- 12-month-old experimental wine samplese2
- Outcome
- amplifiede2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- 18-month-old onese2
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“differentiate some Romanian grapevine cultivars”
e2“The 12-month-old experimental wine samples were more amplified than the 18-month-old ones”
Title
DNA Fingerprinting Used for Testing Some Romanian Wine Varieties
Monica Hârța; Doru Pamfil; Rodica Pop; et al. http://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/horticulture/article/download/7041/6302/ 2011. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:7041
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource Residual grape DNA could be detected in wine up to 18 months after fermentation and was suitable for DNA fingerprinting.
- Method / resource Among the microsatellites tested, VVS2 and VVMD7 gave satisfactory results.
- Method / resource The VVS2 marker generated the shortest PCR amplicons, of 119-138 bp.
- Observation The VVS2 marker amplified all of the grapevine cultivars analyzed in the wine samples.
- Observation Authentication of commercial wine grape material by PCR was unsuccessful due to insufficient residual DNA.