Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The liquid fertilizer regime could improve the quality and usability level of tobacco leaf.

A claim from Effects of Liquid Fertilizer on Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid fertilizer regime could improve the quality and usability level of tobacco leaf.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
rational application of liquid fertilizer with reducing 10% of base fertilizer and 30% of topdressinge2
Outcome
quality and usability level of tobacco leafe3
Direction
improvee3
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–76
e3

“could improve the stress resistance of tobacco plant, the quality and usability level of tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–855
e2

“Compared with conventional fertilization, rational application of liquid fertilizer with reducing 10% of base fertilizer and 30% of topdressing, supplemented with liquid fertilizer, had no obvious influence on the yield, economical characters and chlorophyll content of tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–748

Title

Effects of Liquid Fertilizer on Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco

Shi Jing-hu Hunan Agricultural Sciences 2015

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ebe290a5686d4a251563652013460b2b8b0f603d6f752627289d16d3bd2811f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 125 positive, 14 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.