Claim · model-written summary
Across irrigation treatments soil moisture ranged from approximately 40% to 18%.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosat0 - Outcome
- soil moisturee0
- Value
- approx. 40% to 18%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kiwifruit”
e0“soil moisture ranged from approx. 40% to 18%”
Title
Roberto Di Biase; Maria Calabritto; Alba N. Mininni; et al. Irrigation Science 2025. doi:10.1007/s00271-025-01020-1
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource A piecewise linear regression model explained the relationship between microtensiometer-based trunk water potential and pressure chamber-based stem water potential (R2 = 0.78).
- Observation The relationship between MT-based TWP and SWP showed different slopes when SWP dropped below -1.6 MPa.
- Association Diurnal trunk water potential was mostly driven by vapor pressure deficit in well-irrigated vines (R2 = 0.74).
- Association In Mild and Severe irrigation treatments, a model including a soil water content term explained TWP response with R2 = 0.66.
- Observation Across irrigation treatments trunk water potential ranged from approximately -0.01 to -1.1 MPa.