Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Strip-till drill reduced operating cost by Rs 1, 578/ha relative to local drills.

A claim from Effect of planting density and improved seeding machinery on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max) · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip-till drill reduced operating cost by Rs 1, 578/ha relative to local drills.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
strip-till seed-cum-fertilizer drille0
Outcome
cost of operatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
Rs 1, 578/hae0
Comparator
local seed drillse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strip-till seed-cum-fertilizer drill reduced the cost of operation by Rs 935 and Rs 1, 578/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–466
e1

“over the local seed drills used by the farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–587
t0

“soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105

Title

Effect of planting density and improved seeding machinery on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max)

P. M. Nimje; Vijay Agrawal; Rashmi Soni Indian Journal of Agronomy 2003

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ec834de45e032d2a1b746cae6be82975ffc616fd610ad5430500a46f4180ad8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

transplanting · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 32 positive, 12 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.