Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep placement of both fertilizers significantly increased soybean dry weight.

A claim from Analysis of the nitrogen nutrition of soybean plants with deep placement of coated urea and lime nitrogen · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of both fertilizers significantly increased soybean dry weight.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
LN and CUe0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control treatment (Cont) without deep placemente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep placement of LN and CU significantly enhanced the dry weight and N content of the plants compared with the control treatment (Cont) without deep placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–546
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45

Title

Analysis of the nitrogen nutrition of soybean plants with deep placement of coated urea and lime nitrogen

Kaushal Tewari; Takanori Sato; Mayumi Abiko; et al. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00194.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ed058de1ebab067e3a1c0c02d53f659b44a5dc3a3e87eac4313b0fad76e6a9dd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

calcium cyanamide · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 117 positive, 36 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.