Claim · model-written summary
Average leaf absorptance at 465 nm (Abt465, about 0.96) was about 14% higher than the standard value of 0.84.
- Taxon
- vascular plantt0
- Outcome
- Abt465e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- ≈14%e0
- Qualifier
- ≈ 0.96e0
- Comparator
- standard valuee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSetting
Verbatim
t0“vascular plant”
e0“The average Abt465 (≈ 0.96) and Abt625 (≈ 0.89) were ≈14% and 6% higher than the standard value (AbtF = 0.84)”
Title
R. J. Ritchie; J. W. Runcie Photosynthetica 2014. doi:10.1007/s11099-014-0069-y
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Method / resource A reflectance-absorptance-transmittance (RAT) meter was described for routine measurement of actual leaf absorptance, and its results were compared with those from a Taylor integrating sphere.
- Association Parallel venation had no significant effect on Abt465 in banana.
- Association Parallel venation had no significant effect on Abt465 in Doryanthes.
- Association Parallel venation had no significant effect on Abt465 in a Dendrobium orchid.
- Association Parallel venation had no significant effect on Abt465 in pineapple.
- Association Parallel venation had no significant effect on Abt465 in sugarcane.
- Association In the fern A. nidus there was a slight difference in Abt465 related to parallel venation.
- Observation Average leaf absorptance at 625 nm (Abt625, about 0.89) was about 6% higher than the standard value of 0.84.
- Observation The PAR-range absorptance Abt400-700 (about 0.88) was only about 5% higher than the standard value.
- Observation In some species such as water lily, absorptances at blue and red wavelengths are quite different.
- Recommendation Reflectance measurements of leaves with the RAT would also be useful for remote sensing studies.