Claim · model-written summary
Emistim plus Gumi-30 and Emistim plus Siliplant did not differ significantly on studied traits.
- Taxon
- pear
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communist0 - Outcome
- studied traitse0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- variants with Emistim and complex fertilizers such as Gumi-30 and Siliplante0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference between the variants with Emistim and complex fertilizers such as Gumi-30 and Siliplant according to the studied traits”
t0“pear seedlings”
Title
Biological technology for the production of pear seedlings
Svetlana Rezvyakova; Aleksandr Gurin; Nikolai Revin BIO Web of Conferences 2020. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20202505002
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Emistim significantly stimulated pear seedling growth versus control.
- Intervention effect Emistim with Gumi-30 and Siliplant increased seedling foliage and leaf area.
- Intervention effect The combination increased root number and total root length.
- Intervention effect The combination increased standard planting material yield.
- Observation One fertilizer variant yielded 93.2% standard grade 1 and 2 seedlings.
- Observation The other fertilizer variant yielded 95.6% standard grade 1 and 2 seedlings.