Paper · 2020 · BIO Web of Conferences

Biological technology for the production of pear seedlings

Svetlana Rezvyakova; Aleksandr Gurin; Nikolai Revin

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The research was carried out during the 2017-2019 period on leached chernozem according to the “Program and methodology for studying varieties of fruit, berry and nut crops” (Orel, 1999). The grafting was done by budding fifty plants of the regionalized variety of pears Muratovskaya on the seedlings of common pear tree in three replicates. The plants were placed in one row at a distance of 20-25 cm, with a distance of 90 cm between the rows. In the experimental variants, watering and loosening of the soil was done as needed. The seedlings were treated with a knapsack sprayer 4 times during the growing season with an interval of two weeks, starting from the third decade of May. In the experiment there were 4 variants: 1 control without treatments; 2 - Emistim - 1 ml / m 3 H 2 O; 3 Emistim - 1 ml / m 3 H 2 O + Gumi-30 super-universal 15 ml / 10l H 2 O; 4 Emistim - 1 ml / m 3 H 2 O + Siliplant 25 ml / 10l H 2 O. It was revealed that the biological product Emistim has a significant stimulating effect on the growth processes in comparison to the control variant. The combined use of the biological product Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplant helps to increase the foliage of the seedlings, leaf area, the number of roots and their total length, and, ultimately, increase the yield of standard planting material. There was no significant difference between the variants with Emistim and complex fertilizers such as Gumi-30 and Siliplant according to the studied traits. In total, in these variants, the standard seedlings of the 1st and 2nd grade were obtained, respectively, 93.2 and 95.6%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Emistim significantly stimulated pear seedling growth versus control.

Treatment
Emistime0
Outcome
growth processese0
Direction
stimulatinge0
Comparator
control variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biological product Emistim has a significant stimulating effect on the growth processes in comparison to the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emistim with Gumi-30 and Siliplant increased seedling foliage and leaf area.

Treatment
Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplante0
Outcome
foliage of the seedlings, leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined use of the biological product Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplant helps to increase the foliage of the seedlings, leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased root number and total root length.

Treatment
Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplante0
Outcome
number of roots and their total lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplant helps to increase the foliage of the seedlings, leaf area, the number of roots and their total length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased standard planting material yield.

Treatment
Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplante0
Outcome
yield of standard planting materiale0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emistim and complex fertilizers Gumi-30 and Siliplant helps to increase the foliage of the seedlings, leaf area, the number of roots and their total length, and, ultimately, increase the yield of standard planting material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Emistim plus Gumi-30 and Emistim plus Siliplant did not differ significantly on studied traits.

Outcome
studied traitse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
variants with Emistim and complex fertilizers such as Gumi-30 and Siliplante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the variants with Emistim and complex fertilizers such as Gumi-30 and Siliplant according to the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One fertilizer variant yielded 93.2% standard grade 1 and 2 seedlings.

Outcome
standard seedlings of the 1st and 2nd gradee0
Value
93.2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the standard seedlings of the 1st and 2nd grade were obtained, respectively, 93.2 and 95.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other fertilizer variant yielded 95.6% standard grade 1 and 2 seedlings.

Outcome
standard seedlings of the 1st and 2nd gradee0
Value
95.6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the standard seedlings of the 1st and 2nd grade were obtained, respectively, 93.2 and 95.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.