Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct seeding and 25-day transplants produced the highest root yield without a significant difference between them.

A claim from EFFECT OF TRANSPLANTING DATES ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN THE NEWLY RECLAIMED LANDS UNDER SINAI CONDITIONS · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding and 25-day transplants produced the highest root yield without a significant difference between them.

Treatment
transplant 25 days agee0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
direct seedinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both direct seeding and transplant 25 days age produced the highest root yield without significant difference between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–476
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

Title

EFFECT OF TRANSPLANTING DATES ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN THE NEWLY RECLAIMED LANDS UNDER SINAI CONDITIONS

M. Yousef Journal of Plant Production 2009. doi:10.21608/jpp.2009.119119

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-edb83efea058229ea9ba4ce0257316d708b3ab26e1d3a71a59f53e08b833ae3b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

transplanting · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Direct drilling reduced sugar or ethanol yield relative to conventional production.

    Potential agronomic options for energy‐efficient sugar beet‐based bioethanol production in northern Japan · 2009 · compared with conventional sugar beet production system

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Plots drilled to a stand were no more variable in root yield or plant density than carefully hand-singled plots in sugar beet.

    The size and shape of plots in sugar‐beet experiments · 1975 · compared with carefully hand‐singled plots

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Transplants produced outdoors yielded nearly the same as greenhouse transplants.

    Improving sugar beet yield, quality, and water use efficiency by nursery and transplanting practice under semi‐arid conditions · 2022 · compared with those produced inside a greenhouse

    No difference from an alternative

  4. no effect
    Under control conditions, transplanted and direct-sown sugar beet did not differ significantly in sugar yield.

    IMPROVING THE POTENTIAL YIELD OF SUGAR BEET CROP UNDER SALINITy STRESS · 2006 · compared with direct seed sowing

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Earlier drilling significantly raised root yield.

    Influence of sowing and harvest dates on production of two different cultivars of sugar beet · 2017

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Broadcast application increased crop yield by 15% compared with banding.

    Repeated Reduced Rates of Broadleaf Herbicides in Combination with Methylated Seed Oil for Postemergence Weed Control in Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris)1 · 2005 · compared with banded herbicide application

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Conventional tillage with fertilizer broadcast had higher sugar beet root yield and recoverable sucrose than strip tillage treatments under flood irrigation.

    Impact of Tillage, Irrigation Method, and Nitrogen Rate on Sugar Beet Productivity · 2014 · compared with ST or SN treatments

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Direct sowing gave larger total and commercial production than the seedling treatments when all were harvested on the same date.

    Relação entre produção de beterraba, Beta vulgaris var. conditiva, e diferentes métodos de plantio · 2008 · compared with bare-root seedlings and seedlings grown on 128, 200 and 288-cell trays

    Same direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.