Claim · model-written summary
The best NIRS calibration equation for TIVD had R2 of 0.92.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- calibration equation for TIVDe4
- Value
- R 2 of 0.92e4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The best NIRS calibration equation for TIVD had R 2 of 0.92”
t0“QUALITY OF ALFALFA HERBAGE”
Title
S. S. BUGHRARA; D. A. SLEPER; R. L. BELYEA; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1989. doi:10.4141/cjps89-099
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Method / resource Correlations between IVDMD from the cellulase assays and TIVD ranged from 0.91 to 0.96.
- Method / resource Prepared cellulase solution digestion gave rapid and accurate estimates of TIVD, compared with two rumen fermentation procedures.
- Method / resource The best NIRS calibration equation for TIVD had a standard error of selection of 20.7 g kg −1.
- Method / resource NIRS could accurately estimate TIVD across a wide range of alfalfa herbage quality.
- Method / resource Regression coefficients between IVDMD and TIVD from the cellulase assays ranged from 0.94 to 0.98.