Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased soybean grain yield performance.

A claim from SOYBEAN BASE FERTILIZATION: CHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL SOIL INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased soybean grain yield performance.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
delayed sowing periode0
Outcome
grain yield performancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean biometric and grain yield performance is decreased with the delayed sowing period, regardless of the type of fertilizer utilized for base fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1527

Title

SOYBEAN BASE FERTILIZATION: CHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL SOIL INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD

Paulo Henrique Cazarim; Marcelo Augusto de Aguiar e Silva; Adriana Pereira da Silva; et al. Colloquium Agrariae 2023. doi:10.5747/ca.2023.v19.h511

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-edd6513d7fa48bbbf16beece91d6c90479e2aa6fac88f75c3c3fd6bd7ea7d089 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 115 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Adapting planting dates and cultivar choices increases yield in temperate regions and avoids 7–18% of global losses.

    Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield · 2011

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Late April or early May planting increased economic return.

    Soybean Seed Yield Response to Planting Date and Seeding Rate in the Upper Midwest · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Early planting increased seed number, pod number and harvest index compared with late planting.

    Response of Soybean Yield Components to Management System and Planting Date · 2004 · compared with late planting date

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Adaptation assessments suggest that changes in sowing date and winter wheat and soybean cultivar selection could significantly affect crop production in the 21st century.

    Potential impact of climate change on selected agricultural crops in north‐eastern Austria · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Early May planting increased yield by 358 kg ha −1 compared with late May.

    Responses of Canopy Reflectance, Light Interception, and Soybean Seed Yield to Replanting Suboptimal Stands · 2014 · compared with late May

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Early-planted soybeans yielded more than late-planted soybeans.

    The Effects of Three Cultural Variables on the Incidence ofNomuraea rileyi, Phytophagous Lepidoptera, and Their Predators on Soybeans1 · 1979 · compared with late-planted soybeans

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Cultivar CX232 yielded 7% more with early than late planting on silt loam soil

    Soybean Agronomic Response to Management Systems in the Upper Midwest · 2003 · compared with late planting date

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Early planting produced soybean yield equal to or above later planting, except once.

    Tillage, Row Spacing, and Planting Date Effects on Soybean following Corn or Wheat · 1992 · compared with planted later

    Opposite direction

198 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.