Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cocksfoot dry weight with compost was significantly below mineral fertilizer.

A claim from Compost Organic Amendments in Fodder Crops: Effects on Yield, Nitrogen Utilization and Soil Characteristics · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocksfoot dry weight with compost was significantly below mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
MSW and OPC compostse0
Outcome
mean cumulative dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Min treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cocksfoot fertilized with MSW and OPC composts, the mean cumulative dry weight increased by 20.85 and 16.51%, respectively compared to the control, but it was significantly lower than Min treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1060

Title

Compost Organic Amendments in Fodder Crops: Effects on Yield, Nitrogen Utilization and Soil Characteristics

F. Montemurro; M. Maiorana; G. Convertini; et al. Compost Science & Utilization 2006. doi:10.1080/1065657x.2006.10702272

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ee4b930d8dec56fd82e78d1cdeadf67c00da498c90400443ceb6bf259a8c0a47 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.