Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ten percent Azadirachta indica extract produced 100% okra flea beetle repellence.

A claim from DETERMINATION OF REPELLENCE POTENTIALS OF SOME AQUEOUS PLANT EXTRACTS AGAINST OKRA FLEA BEETLES PODAGRICA UNIFORMA · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten percent Azadirachta indica extract produced 100% okra flea beetle repellence.

Treatment
Azadirachta indicae0
Interactor
okra flea beetlest0pest
Outcome
repellence valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
control (Distilled water)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10% aqueous extract of Piper guineense and Azadirachta indica had the highest percentage repellence values (100%) while control (Distilled water) had the least value (0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–682
t0

“OKRA FLEA BEETLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95

Title

DETERMINATION OF REPELLENCE POTENTIALS OF SOME AQUEOUS PLANT EXTRACTS AGAINST OKRA FLEA BEETLES PODAGRICA UNIFORMA

E O Echereobia; C S Okerere; K C Emeaso; et al. Journal of Biopesticides 2010. doi:10.57182/jbiopestic.3.2.505-507

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-eecfa8b16ff59c988888f907d06aa51c44a5b914a84cdec86bdd3d5985cc3b18 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azadirachta indica · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.