Claim · model-written summary
No shading gave the worst microtuber growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.
Zantedeschiat0 - Treatment
- no shading treatmente0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- worste0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In no shading treatment, microtuber growth was the worst”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Title
Yoo YongKweon Horticultural Science and Technology 2008
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Pure peatmoss or perlite gave poor microtuber growth.
- Intervention effect A 2:2 peatmoss and perlite mix improved microtuber formation and growth.
- Intervention effect A 2:1:1 peatmoss, perlite and vermiculite mix improved microtuber formation and growth.
- Intervention effect Spacing of 8×8 cm supported effective microtuber growth.
- Intervention effect Standard compost and fertilizer amounts produced more microtubers.
- Intervention effect Twice or half standard compost and fertilizer amounts gave poor microtuber size and weight.
- Intervention effect No shading produced leaf sun scald.
- Intervention effect 75% shading improved microtuber growth over control.
- Intervention effect 90% shading improved microtuber growth over control.