Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effect of cultivation method on the microtuber formation and growth in micropropagated plantlet of Zantedeschia spp. ‘Florex Gold’. The microtuber growth was bad in treatment of 100% peatmoss or perlite. The microtuber formation and growth was more effective in mixing with 2:2 of peatmoss:perlite or 2:1:1 of peatmoss:perlite:vermiculite by volume than the others. When the micropropagated plantlet was planted at a spacing of 8×8 cm, microtuber growth was effective. The standard amount treatment of compost, basal fertilizer, and top fertilizer was better in microtuber production than the other treatments. Two or half times treatment of standard amount in compost and fertilizer showed the bad growth in circumstance, diameter, and weight. In no shading treatment, microtuber growth was the worst and showed sun scald of leaf. However, microtuber growth was better in 75 and 90% shading than control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Pure peatmoss or perlite gave poor microtuber growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.
Zantedeschiat0 - Treatment
- 100% peatmoss or perlitee0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- bade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The microtuber growth was bad in treatment of 100% peatmoss or perlite.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
A 2:2 peatmoss and perlite mix improved microtuber formation and growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- 2:2 of peatmoss:perlitee0
- Outcome
- microtuber formation and growthe0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- the otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The microtuber formation and growth was more effective in mixing with 2:2 of peatmoss:perlite or 2:1:1 of peatmoss:perlite:vermiculite by volume than the others.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
A 2:1:1 peatmoss, perlite and vermiculite mix improved microtuber formation and growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- 2:1:1 of peatmoss:perlite:vermiculitee0
- Outcome
- microtuber formation and growthe0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- the otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The microtuber formation and growth was more effective in mixing with 2:2 of peatmoss:perlite or 2:1:1 of peatmoss:perlite:vermiculite by volume than the others.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 8×8 cm supported effective microtuber growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- spacing of 8×8 cme0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planted at a spacing of 8×8 cm, microtuber growth was effective.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Standard compost and fertilizer amounts produced more microtubers.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- standard amount treatment of compost, basal fertilizer, and top fertilizere0
- Outcome
- microtuber productione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The standard amount treatment of compost, basal fertilizer, and top fertilizer was better in microtuber production than the other treatments.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Twice or half standard compost and fertilizer amounts gave poor microtuber size and weight.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- Two or half times treatment of standard amount in compost and fertilizere0
- Outcome
- growth in circumstance, diameter, and weighte0
- Direction
- bade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two or half times treatment of standard amount in compost and fertilizer showed the bad growth in circumstance, diameter, and weight.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
No shading gave the worst microtuber growth.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- no shading treatmente0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- worste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In no shading treatment, microtuber growth was the worst”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
No shading produced leaf sun scald.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- no shading treatmente0
- Outcome
- sun scald of leafe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In no shading treatment, microtuber growth was the worst and showed sun scald of leaf.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
75% shading improved microtuber growth over control.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- 75e0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“microtuber growth was better in 75 and 90% shading than control.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
90% shading improved microtuber growth over control.
- Taxon
- Zantedeschia spp.Zantedeschiat0
- Treatment
- 90% shadinge0
- Outcome
- microtuber growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“microtuber growth was better in 75 and 90% shading than control.”
t0“Zantedeschia spp.”
The same questions in other papers
growing medium · growth · ZantedeschiaPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
fertilization · growth · ZantedeschiaPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
fertilization · yield · ZantedeschiaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.